Modelo de innovación educativa con tecnologías emergentes y metodologías flexibles para la Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano
| dc.contributor.advisor | Cardona Madariaga, Diego Fernando | |
| dc.creator | Arias Cucunuba, Erika Yesenia | |
| dc.creator | Báez Zambrano, Nicole Andrea | |
| dc.creator | León Martin, Manuel Alejandro | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-01-13T21:31:51Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2025-12-01 | |
| dc.description.abstract | El presente trabajo propone un modelo de innovación educativa para la Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano, integrando tecnologías emergentes y metodologías flexibles con el objetivo de fortalecer la educación continua. Se analiza el impacto de la transformación digital en la educación superior, especialmente tras la pandemia de COVID-19, que aceleró la adopción de plataformas virtuales y evidencia la necesidad de adaptación en los modelos educativos tradicionales. El estudio se fundamenta en los marcos conceptuales VUCA (Volatilidad, Incertidumbre, Complejidad y Ambigüedad)y BANI (Frágil, Ansioso, No Lineal e Incomprensible), que permiten comprender los desafíos del entorno educativo actual. Además, se examina la competencia de plataformas globales como Coursera y edX, que han redefinido la educación digital, impulsando nuevas estrategias para la sostenibilidad financiera de las universidades. Se realiza una revisión del estado del arte, analizando tendencias como inteligencia artificial, aprendizaje automatizado y realidad aumentada, las cuales facilitan la personalización y accesibilidad del aprendizaje. La metodología incluye un análisis contextual, entrevistas con expertos y estudios de caso para evaluar la viabilidad del modelo estratégico. El resultado es una propuesta innovadora que busca optimizar la oferta educativa, asegurando su pertinencia en un mercado dinámico. Se plantea un modelo estratégico adaptable, alineado con las exigencias del entorno digital y laboral, garantizando la sostenibilidad operativa y la mejora continua en la educación continua de la universidad. | |
| dc.description.abstractenglish | This paper proposes a model of educational innovation for the University of Bogota Jorge Tadeo Lozano, integrating emerging technologies and flexible methodologies with the objective of strengthening continuing education. The impact of digital transformation in higher education is analyzed, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic, which accelerated the adoption of virtual platforms and highlights the need for adaptation to traditional educational models. The study is based on the conceptual frameworks VUCA (Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity and Ambiguity) and BANI (Fragile, Anxious, Non-linear and Incomprehensible), which make it possible to understand the challenges of today’s educational environment. In addition, it examines the competition from global platforms such as Coursera and edX, which have redefined digital education, driving new strategies for financial sustainability of universities. A state-of-the-art review is conducted, analyzing trends such as artificial intelligence, machine learning and augmented reality, which facilitate the personalization and accessibility of learning. The methodology includes a contextual analysis, expert interviews and case studies to assess the feasibility of the strategic model. The result is an innovative proposal that seeks to optimize the educational offer, ensuring its relevance in a dynamic market. It proposes an adaptable strategic model, aligned with the requirements of the digital and work environment, ensuring operational sustainability and continuous improvement in continuing education at the university. | |
| dc.format.extent | 60 páginas | |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12010/38751 | |
| dc.language.iso | es | |
| dc.relation.references | Affouneh, S., Salha, S., & Khlaif. (2020). Designing quality e-learning environments for emergency remote teaching in coronavirus crisis. MedEdPublish, 9(1), 1–6. Obtenido de https://mededpublish.org/articles/9-49 | |
| dc.relation.references | Auckland, T. U. (2020). Informe Anual 2020. Obtenido de https://www.auckland.ac.nz/assets/about-us/about-the-university/theuniversity/ official-publications/annual-report/2020-Annual-Report-UoA-final.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. (2021). La educación en América Latina en la era digital. Obtenido de BID: https://publications.iadb.org/ | |
| dc.relation.references | Bennett, N; & Lemoine, G. (2014). What VUCA really means for you. Harvard Business Review. | |
| dc.relation.references | Bond, M. (2021). Digital transformation in German higher education: Student and teacher perceptions. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education | |
| dc.relation.references | Carrillo, C., & & Flores, M. (2020). COVID-19 and teacher education: A literature review of online teaching and learning practices. Obtenido de European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 466–487: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02619768.2020.1821184 | |
| dc.relation.references | Cascio, J. (2020). Facing the age of chaos: BANI and the future of resilience. Institute for the Future. Obtenido de https://jamaiscascio.com/2020/04/facing-the-age-of-chaos/ | |
| dc.relation.references | CCL. (2018). Modelo RUPT: Rápido, Impredecible, Paradójico y Trascendente. Confederación de Compañías de Liderazgo. | |
| dc.relation.references | Center for Creative Leadership & Agility Consulting and Training, LLC. (2018). Redefining talent for the new world of work. Obtenido de Center for Creative Leadership.: https://www.ccl.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Redefining-Talent- CCL-White-Paper.pdf | |
| dc.relation.references | Christensen et al., 2. (2015). What is disruptive innovation? Harvard Business Review, 44- 53. Obtenido de https://www.hbs.edu/ris/Publication%20Files/McDonald_Rory_A04_What%20is% 20Disruptive%20Innovation_182498a6-5391-4916-a38b-d14932db41a6.pdf? | |
| dc.relation.references | Coursera. (2022). Global Skills Report 2022. Coursera Inc. Obtenido de https://www.coursera.org/global-skills-report | |
| dc.relation.references | DANE. (2021). Encuesta de educación formal 2020. https://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/educacion/encuesta-deeducacion- formal. | |
| dc.relation.references | Garrison, D. R. (2008). lended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105. | |
| dc.relation.references | Grench A. & Camilleri, A. (2017). Blockchain in education. Obtenido de Joint Research Centre Science for Policy Report: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC108255? | |
| dc.relation.references | Hamid, S. (2021). Understanding students’ experiences with online learning during COVID-19: A focus on pedagogical strategies. The Internet and Higher Education, 51, 100824. | |
| dc.relation.references | Holmes, W. (2019). The future of education: Using technology to enhance learning. In Education Futures. | |
| dc.relation.references | Huang, R. (2022). Disruptive learning technologies in higher education: A review. British Journal of Educational Technology. | |
| dc.relation.references | Kaplan R. S & Norto, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Harvard Business School Press. | |
| dc.relation.references | Kara, M. (2025). Managing business continuity and resilience in higher education institutions without compromising the quality of education. Obtenido de University of XYZ: https://www.xyz.edu/reports/kara2025 | |
| dc.relation.references | Knowles, M. (1980a). The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy (2nd ed). Cambridge Books. | |
| dc.relation.references | Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy (2nd ed.). Cambridge Books. Obtenido de https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Modern_Practice_of_Adult_Education. html?id=_gifAAAAMAAJ& | |
| dc.relation.references | Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading Change. Harvard Business School Press. Obtenido de https://books.google.com/books/about/Leading_Change.html?id=xpGX1EWL_EM C& | |
| dc.relation.references | Labhane, S. (2024). Big data analytics in education: Transforming student learning and institutional practices. Cahiers Magellanes-NS, 6(2). | |
| dc.relation.references | Labhane, S. I. (2024). Big Data Analytics in Education: Transforming Student Learning and Institutional Practices. CAHIERS MAGELLANES-NS, 6(2). Obtenido de https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384018416_BIG_DATA_ANALYTICS_I N_EDUCATION_TRANSFORMING_STUDENT_LEARNING_AND_INSTITUT IONAL_PRACTICES? | |
| dc.relation.references | Marín Ríos, A. (2023). Apropiación de la educación STEM/STEAM en Colombia: Una revisión a la producción de trabajos de grado. Obtenido de Revista Científica, 47(2), 55–70.: https://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/revcie/article/view/20473 | |
| dc.relation.references | Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2021). Informe de matrícula en educación superior 2019–2021. Bogotá, Colombia. Obtenido de https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/portal/ | |
| dc.relation.references | Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning. Free Press. Obtenido de https://archive.org/details/risefallofstrate0000mint | |
| dc.relation.references | Mishra, L., Gupta, T., & & Shree, A. (2020). Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1, 100012. | |
| dc.relation.references | OCDE. (2021). Education at a Glance 2021: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing. Oxford University Press. Piaget, J. (1970). The psychology of intelligence. Littlefield, Adams & Co | |
| dc.relation.references | Ramírez, R., & Wilkinson, A. (2016). Strategic reframing: The Oxford scenario planning approach. Oxford University Press. | |
| dc.relation.references | Redilat. (2023). Transformación de los modelos de acreditación educativa mediante herramientas digitales. Red Iberoamericana para el Desarrollo de la Calidad en la Educación Superior. | |
| dc.relation.references | Rojas, J. (2021). Prospectiva: Construyendo el futuro de las comunicaciones satelitales en México. Obtenido de Transdigital, 2(4): https://revista.transdigital.mx/index.php/transdigital/article/view/73 | |
| dc.relation.references | Roll, I., & & Wylie, R. (2016). Evolution and revolution in artificial intelligence in education. Obtenido de International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 582–599: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0110-3 | |
| dc.relation.references | Rosenberg, M. (2001). E-learning: Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age. McGraw-Hill. | |
| dc.relation.references | Rosenberg, M. J. (2021). The e-learning revolution: Transforming education with technology. Obtenido de Wiley: https://www.mheducation.com/highered/mhp/product/e-learning-strategiesdelivering- knowledge-digital-age.html? | |
| dc.relation.references | Seemiller, C. (2022). Navigating complexity: Applying VUCA and BANI frameworks in higher education leadership. Journal of Leadership Education. | |
| dc.relation.references | Senge, P. (2006). he fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization (Revised ed.). Doubleday. | |
| dc.relation.references | UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. Obtenido de https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707 | |
| dc.relation.references | UNESCO. (2022). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing. Obtenido de https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707 | |
| dc.relation.references | Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press. | |
| dc.relation.references | Wang, X. (2021). The digital divide and access to online education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Computers & Education, 177, 104231. | |
| dc.relation.references | World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development (Annex to A/42/427). Obtenido de United Nations.: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-commonfuture. pdf | |
| dc.subject | Innovación educativa | |
| dc.subject | Educación continua | |
| dc.subject | Tecnologías emergentes | |
| dc.subject | Transformación digital | |
| dc.subject | Marcos VUCA y BANI | |
| dc.subject | Analítica de datos educativa | |
| dc.subject | Sostenibilidad institucional | |
| dc.subject | Modelo estratégico | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Educational innovation | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Continuing education | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Emerging technologies | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Digital transformation | |
| dc.subject.keyword | VUCA and BANI frameworks | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Educational data analytics | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Institutional sustainability | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Strategic model | |
| dc.subject.lemb | Innovación educativa | |
| dc.subject.lemb | Educación superior - Innovaciones tecnológicas | |
| dc.subject.lemb | Educación continua | |
| dc.title | Modelo de innovación educativa con tecnologías emergentes y metodologías flexibles para la Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano | |
| dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec |
Archivos
Bloque original
1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
- Nombre:
- MODELO DE INNOVACIÓN EDUCATIVA CON TECNOLOGÍAS EMERGENTES Y METODOLOGÍAS FLEXIBLES PARA LA UJTL.pdf
- Tamaño:
- 1.28 MB
- Formato:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
