Residencia multianual de tres especies de tiburones (Carcharhinus limbatus, C. acronotus y Sphyrna tiburo) en la costa centro occidental de Florida : ¿posible área de crianza?

dc.contributor.advisorPolo-Silva, Carlos Julio
dc.contributor.advisorSanjuan-Muñoz, Adolfo Mario
dc.contributor.advisorBarrera-García, Angélica
dc.contributor.advisorGarzón-Peña, Lina Vanesa
dc.creatorRivera-Salguero, Jose David
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-12T18:56:56Z
dc.date.available2024-08-12T18:56:56Z
dc.date.created2024-06-04
dc.description.abstractLas áreas de crianza son hábitats específicos que los juveniles de ciertos animales utilizan para sobrevivir durante sus primeras etapas, las más vulnerables. Estas áreas ofrecen protección contra depredadores y acceso a recursos alimentarios. La falta de estandarización en la definición de áreas de crianza para tiburones ha llevado a considerar vastas áreas como tales, basándose únicamente en la presencia de juveniles y neonatos. Para abordar este problema se han establecido tres criterios fundamentales para identificar sitios de crianza para los tiburones: la abundancia, la permanencia y el uso multianual. Los tiburones a menudo exhiben comportamientos de agregación o agrupamiento, que proporcionan beneficios como protección contra depredadores y optimización en la búsqueda de recursos. Estos comportamientos pueden estar relacionados tanto con estrategias reproductivas como con la optimización trófica y presentan la posibilidad de incluir segregación sexual en ambos contextos. Por lo tanto, entre 2013 y 2022 durante los meses de mayo a agosto (verano), se evaluaron los criterios de área de crianza en St. Joseph Sound, Florida, para tres especies: Carcharhinus limbatus, Carcharhinus acronotus y Sphyrna tiburo. Se utilizaron métodos de captura como redes de enmalle, palangre, y caña y carrete. La especie C. limbatus tuvo la mayor abundancia, (n = 580 individuos) predominando los inmaduros (91.6 %), con tallas de 26.5 a 178.0 cm LT, y proporción sexual 1:1 en adultos. Se detectaron 375 individuos C. acronotus con tamaños entre 32.5 y 128.0 cm LT, con el 65.6 % de ejemplares inmaduros y proporción de machos y hembras adultas de 1:1. De S. tiburo se registraron 195 especímenes, predominantemente maduros (98 %), con una segregación sexual marcada de 1.00:0.05 a favor de hembras y tallas de 22.0 a 109.0 cm LT. Además, las tallas mínimas de C. limbatus están por debajo de las tallas de nacimiento previamente registradas, sugiriendo una talla de nacimiento menor para esta especie. Dada la alta densidad y abundancia de los juveniles (0.0718 j ha-1 y 13.28 ± 13.87 j mes-1 para C. limbatus, y 0.0332 j ha-1 y 6.13 ± 8.88 j mes-1 para C. acronotus) en comparación a otros sitios cercanos reportados en la literatura, la permanencia en el área (3.9 ± 0.3 meses por año para C. limbatus y 3.2 ± 0.9 meses por año para C. acronotus), y la constante presencia durante los 10 años en ambas especies, St. Joseph Sound puede ser considerada un área de crianza para estas dos especies del género Carcharhinus, mientras que para S. tiburo, debido a la baja cantidad de juveniles, se podría catalogar como un área de agregación con segregación sexual pronunciada.spa
dc.description.abstractenglishNursery areas are specific habitats that juveniles use in order to survive during their most vulnerable early stages. These areas offer protection against predators and access to food resources. The lack of standardization in defining nursery areas for sharks has led to considering vast areas as such, based solely on the presence of juveniles and neonates. In order to address this issue, three fundamental criteria have been established to identify nursery habitats for sharks: abundance, residency, and multi-year use. Sharks often exhibit aggregation or schooling behaviors, providing benefits such as protection against predators and optimization in resource foraging. These behaviors may be related to reproductive strategies and trophic optimization and may involve sexual segregation in both contexts. Therefore, between 2013 and 2022, during the months of May to August (summer), nursery area criteria were evaluated in St. Joseph Sound, Florida, for three species: Carcharhinus limbatus (blacktip), Carcharhinus acronotus (blacknose) and Sphyrna tiburo (bonnethead). Capture methods such as gillnets, longlines, and rod and reel were used. Blacktip had the highest abundance (n = 580 individuals), predominantly immature (91.6 %), with sizes ranging from 26.5 to 178.0 cm TL, and a 1:1 sex ratio in adults. 375 blacknoses were detected, with sizes between 32.5 and 128.0 cm TL, with 65.5 immature specimens and a 1:1 sex ratio in adults. 195 bonnetheads were recorded, predominantly mature (98 %), with marked sexual segregation of 1.00:0.05 in favor of females, and sizes ranging from 22.0 to 109.0 cm TL. Additionally, the minimum sizes of blacktips are below previously recorded birth sizes, suggesting a smaller birth size for this species. Given the high density and abundance (0.0718 j ha-1 and 13.28 ± 13.87 j month-1 for blacktips, and 0.0332 j ha-1 and 6.13 ± 8.88 j month-1 for blacknoses) compared to other nearby sites reported in the literature, the residency in the area (3.9 ± 0.3 months per year for blacktips, and 3.2 ± 0.9 months per year for blacknose), and the constant occurrence over 10 years in both species, St. Joseph Sound may be considered a nursery area for these two species of the genus Carcharhinus, while for bonnetheads, due the low number of juveniles, it might be classified as an aggregation area with pronounced sexual segregation.spa
dc.format.extent72 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12010/34939
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.relation.referencesAroca, A.K., J. Tavera y Y. Torres. 2022. Molecular and morphological evaluation of the bonnethead shark complex Sphyrna tiburo (Carcharhiniformes: Sphyrnidae). Environ. Biol. Fish., 105: 1-16.spa
dc.relation.referencesAyres, K.A., J.M. Ketchum, R. González-Armas, F. Glaván-Magaña, A. Hearn, F.R. Elorriaga-Verplancken, R.O. Martínez-Rincón, E.M. Hoyos-Padilla y S.M. Kajiura. 2021. Seasonal aggregations of blacktip sharks Carcharhinus limbatus at marine protected area in the Gulf of California, assessed by unoccupied aerial .vehicle surveys. Mar Ecol Prog Ser., 678: 95–107.spa
dc.relation.referencesBabcock, G.P. 1993. Webster’s third new international dictionary of the English language—unabridged. Merriam Webster, Springfield, MA. 2764 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesBaremore, I.E., D.M. Bethea y K.I. Andrews. 2007. Gillnet selectivity for juvenile blacktip sharks (Carcharhinus limbatus). Fish. Bull., 2: 230-241.spa
dc.relation.referencesBaremore, I.E. y M.S. Passerotti. 2013. Reproduction of the blacktip shark in the Gulf of Mexico. Mar. Coast. Fish. Dyn. Manag. Ecosyst. Sci., 5: 127–138.spa
dc.relation.referencesBass, A.J. 1978. Problems in studies of sharks in the Southwest Indian Ocean. 545-594. En: Hodgson, E.S. y R.F. Mathewson (Eds.). Sensory biology of sharks, skates and rays. Office of Naval Research, Department of the Navy, Arlington, VA. 66 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesBeck, M.W., K.L. Heck, K.W. Able, D.L. Childers, D.B. Eggleston, B.M. Gillanders, B. Halpern, C.G. Hays, K. Hoshino, T.J. Minello, R.J. Orth, P.F. Sheridan y M.P. Weinstein. 2001. The identification, conservation, and management of estuarine and marine nurseries for fish and invertebrates: a better understanding of the habitats that serve as nurseries for marine species and the factors that create site-specific variability in nursery quality will improve conservation and management of these areas. Bioscience, 51: 633-641.spa
dc.relation.referencesBelcher, C.N. y C.A. Jennings. 2009. Use of a fishery-independent trawl survey to evaluate distribution patterns of subadult sharks in Georgia. Mar. Coast Fish: Dyn. Manag. Ecosyst. Sci., 1: 218–229.spa
dc.relation.referencesBethea, D.M., J.A. Buckel, y J.K. Carlson. 2004. Foraging ecology of the early life stages of four sympatric shark species. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 268: 245–264.spa
dc.relation.referencesBethea, D.M., M.J. Ajemian, J.K. Carlson, E.R. Hoffmayer, J.L. Imhoff, R.D. Grubbs, C.T. Peterson, y G.H. Burgess. 2014. Distribution and community structure of coastal sharks in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico. Environ. Biol. Fish., 98: 1233–1254.spa
dc.relation.referencesBlackburn, J.K., J.A. Neer y B.A. Thompson. 2007. Delineation of bull shark nursery areas in the inland and coastal waters of Louisiana. Amer. Fish. Soc. Symp., 50: 331-343.spa
dc.relation.referencesBonfil, R. 1999. Marine protected areas as a shark fisheries management tool. Paris. Soc. Fr. Ichtyol., 1: 217-230.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrander, K. 1981. Disappearance of common skate Raia batis from Irish Sea. Nature, 290: 48–49.spa
dc.relation.referencesBranstetter, S. 1987 Age and growth estimates for Blacktip. Carcharhinus limbatus, and Spinner, C. brevipinna, Sharks from the Northwestern Gulf of Mexico. Amer. Soc. Ichthyol. Herpetol., 4: 964-974.spa
dc.relation.referencesBranstetter, S. 1990. Early life-history implications of selected Carcharhinoid and Lamnoid sharks of the Northwest Atlantic. 17-27. En: Pratt Jr., H.L., S.H. Gruber y T. Taniuchi, (Eds.). Elasmobranchs as Living Resources: Advances in the Biology, Ecology, Systematics, and the Status of the Fisheries. NOAA Tech. Rep., Seattle, WA. 518 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrewster-Geisz, K.K. y T.J. Miller. 2000. Management of the sandbar shark, Carcharhinus plumbeus: implications of a stage-based model. Fish. Bull., 98: 236–249.spa
dc.relation.referencesBush, A. y K. Holland. 2002. Food limitation in a nursery area: Estimates of daily ration in juvenile scalloped hammerheads, Sphyrna lewini (Griffith and Smith, 1834) in Kane’ohe Bay, O'ahu, Hawaii. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 278: 157−178.spa
dc.relation.referencesCarlson, J.K. 2002. Shark nurseries in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico. 165–182 En McCandless, C.T., H.L. Pratt, Jr., y N. E Kohler, (Eds.). Shark nursery grounds of the Gulf of Mexico and the East Coast waters of the United States: an overview. An internal report to NOAA’s Highly Migratory Species Office., Narragannsett, RI. 287 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesCarlson, J., P. Charvet, C. Avalos, M.P. Blanco-Parra, A. Briones Bell-lloch, D. Cardenosa, E. Espinoza, J.M. Morales-Saldaña, B. Naranjo-Elizondo, J.C. Pérez-Jiménez, E.V.C. Schneider, N.J. Simpson, B.S. Talwar, Z. Crysler, D. Derrick, P.M. Kyne y N. Pacoureau. 2021. Carcharhinus acronotus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2021: e.T161378A887542. https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2021-1.RLTS.T161378A887542.en. 14 pspa
dc.relation.referencesCarrier, J.C., H.L. Pratt y L.K. Martin. 1994. Group reproductive behaviors in free-living nurse sharks, Ginglymostoma cirratum. Copeia 3: 646−656.spa
dc.relation.referencesCastro, J.I. 1987. The position of sharks in marine biological communities. 11-17. En Cook, S.F. (Ed.) Sharks, an inquiry into biology, behavior, fisheries, and use. Oregon State University Extension Servicem Corvallis. 237p.spa
dc.relation.referencesCastro, J.I. 1993. The shark nursery of Bulls Bay, South Carolina, with a review of the shark nurseries of the southeastern coast of the United States. Environ. Biol. Fishes, 38: 37−48.spa
dc.relation.referencesClarke, T. A. 1971. The ecology of the scalloped hammerhead shark, Sphyrna lewini, in Hawaii. Pac. Sci., 25: 133−144.spa
dc.relation.referencesClark, E., y K. Von Schmidt. 1965. Sharks of the central Gulf coast of Florida. Bull. Mar. Sci., 15: 13–83.spa
dc.relation.referencesCompagno, L.J.V. 1984. FAO species catalogue. Vol. 4. Sharks of the world. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of shark species known to date. Part 2. Carcharhiniformes. Food and agriculture organización of the United Nations, Roma. 655 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesCortés, E. 1999. A stochastic stage-based population model of the sandbar shark in the western North Atlantic. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp., 23: 115–136.spa
dc.relation.referencesDavis, R.A. y N.A. Elko. 2003. Geology and Morphodynamics of Caladesi and Honeymoon Islands, Florida. Pinellas County Coastal Management, Field Trip Guide book for Coastal Sediments. Department of Geology Univeristy of South Florida. St. Peterburg, FL, and Pinellas County Department of public Works. Clearwater, FL. 25p.spa
dc.relation.referencesDeAngelis, B.M., C.T. McCandless, N.E. Kohler, C.W. Reckseik y G.B. Skomal. 2008. First characterization of shark nursery habitat in the United States Virgin Islands: evidence of habitat partitioning of two sharks species. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 358: 257–271.spa
dc.relation.referencesDíaz, S.M., J. Settele, E. Brondízio, H. Ngo, M. Guéze, J. Agard, A. Arneth, P. Balvanera, K. Brauman, y S. Butchart. 2019. The Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services). Bonn. 56 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesDriggers, W.B., D.A. Oakley, G. Ulrich, J. K. Carlson, B. J. Cullum, y J. M. Dean. 2004. Reproductive biology of Carcharhinus acronotus in the coastal waters of South Carolina. J. Fish Biol., 64: 1540–1551.spa
dc.relation.referencesDriggers, W.B., B.S. Frazier, D.H. Adams, G.F. Ulrich, C.M. Jones, E.R. Hoffmayer y M.D. Campbell. 2014. Site Fidelity of migratory bonnethead sharks Sphyrna tiburo. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 459: 61-69.spa
dc.relation.referencesDodrill, J.W. 1977. A hook and line survey of the sharks of Melbourne Beach, Brevard County, Florida. Masters Thesis, Fla. Inst. Tech., Melbourne, FL. 304 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesDonelson, J.M., P.L. Munday y M.I. McCormick. 2012. Climate change may affect fish through an interaction of parental and juveniles environments. Coral Reefs, 31: 753-762.spa
dc.relation.referencesDrymon, J.M., S.P. Powers, J. Dindo, B. Dzwonkowski, y T.A. Henwood 2010. Distributions of sharks across a continental shelf in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Mar. Coast. Fish., 2: 440–450.spa
dc.relation.referencesDulvy, N.K., S.L. Fowler, J.A. Musick, R.D. Cavanagh, P.M. Kyne, L.R. Harrison, J.K. Carlson, L.N.K. Davidson, S.V. Fordham, M.P. Francis, C.M. Pollock, C.A. Simpfendorfer, G.H. Burgess, K.E. Carpenter, L.J.V. Compagno, D.A. Ebert, C. Gibson, M.R. Heupel, S.R. Livingstone, J.C. Sanciangco, J.D. Stevens, S. Valenti y W.T. White. 2014. Extinction risk and conservation of the world’s sharks and rays, eLIFE, 3: 1–34.spa
dc.relation.referencesDulvy, N.K., N. Pacoureau, C.L. Rigby, R.A. Pollom, R.W. Jabado, D.A. Ebert, B. Finucci, C.M. Pollock, J. Cheok, D.H. Derrick, K.B. Herman, C.S. Sherman, W.J. VanderWright, J.M. Lawson, R.H.L. Walls, J.K. Carlson, P. Charvet, K.K. Bineesh, D. Fernando, G.M. Ralph, J.H. Matsushiba, C. Hilton-Taylor, S.V. Fordham y C.A. Simpfendorfer. 2021. Overfishing drives over one-third of all sharks and rays toward a global extinction crisis. Current Biology, 31: 4773-4787.spa
dc.relation.referencesEbert, D.A. 1991. Observations on the predatory behavior of the sevengill shark Notorynchus cepedianus. S. Afr. J. Mar. Sci., 11: 455-465.spa
dc.relation.referencesEbert, D.A., M. Dando y S. Fowler. 2021. Sharks of the World: A Complete Guide (Vol. 22). Princeton University Press. Princeton 608 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesFerretti, F., G.L. Worm, M.R. Britten, H.K. Heithaus y H.K Lotze. 2010. Patterns and ecosystem consequences of shark declines in the ocean, Ecol. Lett., 13: 1055–107.spa
dc.relation.references62 Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. 2011. Commercial regulations for shark. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. https://myfwc.com/fishing/saltwater/commercial/sharks/. 26/05/2022.spa
dc.relation.referencesFroeschke, J.T., G.W. Stunz y M.L. Wildhaber. 2010. Environmental influences on the occurrence of coastal sharks in estuarine waters. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 407: 279–292.spa
dc.relation.referencesFroese, R. y D. Pauly (Eds.). 2022. FishBase. www.fishbase.org. 20/12/2022spa
dc.relation.referencesGallucci, V.F., I.G. Taylor y K. Erzini. 2006. Conservation and management of exploited shark populations based on reproductive value. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 63: 931–942.spa
dc.relation.referencesGarla, R.C., D.D. Chapman, B.M. Wetherbee, y M. Shivji. 2006. Movement patterns of young Caribbean reef sharks, Carcharhinus perezi, at Fernando de Noronha Archipelago, Brazil: the potential of marine protected areas for conservation of a nursery ground. Mar Biol, 149: 189–199.spa
dc.relation.referencesGraham, F., P. Rynne, M. Estevanez, J. Luo, J.S. Ault, y N. Hammerschlag. 2016. Use of marine protected areas and exclusive economic zones in the subtropical western North Atlantic Ocean by large highly mobile sharks. Divers. Distrib., 22: 534-546.spa
dc.relation.referencesHammerschlag, N. y C. Fallows. 2005. Galapagos sharks (Carcharhinus galapagensis) at the Bassas da India atoll: first record from the Mozambique Channel and possible significance as a nursery area. S. Afr. J. Sci., 101: 375–377.spa
dc.relation.referencesHeithaus, M.R., D. Burkholder, R.E. Hueter, L.I. Heithaus, H.L. Pratt Jr. y J.C. Carrier. 2007. Spatial and temporal variation in shark communities of the lower keys and evidence for historical population declines. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci, 64: 1302–1313.spa
dc.relation.referencesHeithaus, M.R., L.D. Dill, G.J. Marshall, y B. Buhleier. 2002. Habitat use and foraging behavior of tiger sharks (Galeocerdo cuvier) in a seagrass ecosystem. Mar. Biol., 140: 237–248.spa
dc.relation.referencesHeithaus, M.R. 2007. Nursery areas as essential shark habitats: A theoretical perspective. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp., 50: 3–13.spa
dc.relation.referencesHeppell, S.S., L.B. Crowder y T.R. Menzel. 1999. Life table analysis of long-lived marine species with implications for conservation and management. 137–148 En Musick, J.A. (Ed.). Life in the slow lane: ecology and conservation of long lived marine animals. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp., Bethesda, MD. 260 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesHeupel, M.R. y C.A. Simpfendorfer. 2002. Estimation of mortality of juvenile blacktip sharks, Carcharhinus limbatus, within a nursery area using telemetry data. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 59: 624–632.spa
dc.relation.referencesHeupel, M.R., J.K. Carlson, C.A. Simpfendorfer. 2007. Shark nursery areas: concepts, definition, characterization and assumptions, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 337: 287–297.spa
dc.relation.referencesHeupel, M.R. y C.A. Simpfendorfer. 2005a. Using acoustic monitoring to evaluate MPAs for shark nursery 63reas: the importance of long-term data. Mar Tech Soc J., 39: 10–18.spa
dc.relation.referencesHeupel, M.R. y C.A. Simpfendorfer. 2005b. Quantitative analysis of aggregation behavior in juvenile blacktip sharks. Mar. Biol., 147: 1239-1249.spa
dc.relation.referencesHeupel, M.R. y R.E. Hueter. 2002. The importance of prey density in relation to the movement patterns of juvenile sharks within a coastal nursery area. Mar. Freshw Res., 53: 543–550.spa
dc.relation.referencesHeupel, M.R., C.A. Simpfendorfer, A.B. Collins y J.P. Tyminski. 2006. Residency and movement patterns of bonnethead sharks, Sphyrna tiburo, in a large Florida estuary. Environ Biol. Fish., 76: 47-67.spa
dc.relation.referencesHeyl, M.G., A.B. Munson, J. Hood, J. Morales y M. Kelly. 2010. Proposed Minimum Flows and Levels for Anclote River System. Southwest Florida Water Management District Pursuant to 373.042 F.S. Brooksville, FL. 207p.spa
dc.relation.referencesHoff, T.B. y J.A. Musick. 1990. Western North Atlantic shark fishery management problems and information requirements. 455-472. En: Pratt Jr., H.L., S.H. Gruber y T. Taniuchi (Eds.). Elasmobranchs as Living Resources: Advances in the Biology, Ecology, Systematics, and the Status of the Fisheries. NOAA Tech. Rep., Seattle, WA. 17p.spa
dc.relation.referencesHoffmayer, E.R. y G. R. Parsons. 2003. Food habits of three shark species from the Mississippi Sound in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Southeast. Nat., 2: 271–280.spa
dc.relation.referencesHueter, R.E., M.R. Heupel, E.J. Heist, y D.B. Keeney. 2004. Evidence of philopatry in sharks and implications for the management of shark fisheries. J. Northwest Atl. Fish. Sci., 35: 239–247.spa
dc.relation.referencesHueter, R.E. y J.P Tyminski. 2007. Species-Specific Distribution and Habitat Characteristics of Shark Nurseries in Gulf of Mexico Waters off Peninsular Florida and Texas. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. 50: 193–223.spa
dc.relation.referencesInstituto Nacional de la Pesca (INP). 2000. Carta Nacional Pesquera 2000. Instituto Nacional de la Pesca, México, Distrito Federal. https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/117725/Carta-Nacional-Pesquera-2000.pdf. 16/06/2022.spa
dc.relation.referencesJacoby, D.M., D.S. Busawon y D.W. Sims. 2010. Sex and Social networking: the influence of male presence on social structure of female shark groups. Behav. Ecol., 21: 808-818.spa
dc.relation.referencesJacoby, D.M., D.P. Croft, D.W. Sims. 2012. Social behaviour in sharks and rays: analysis, patterns and implications for conservation. Fish and Fish., 13: 399−417.spa
dc.relation.referencesKaijura, S.M. y S.L. Tellman. 2016. Quantification of Massive Seasonal Aggregations of Blacktip Sharks (Carcharhinus limbatus) in Southeast Florida. PLoS one, 1: 1-16.spa
dc.relation.referencesKeeney, D. B., M. Heupel, R. E. Hueter, y E. J. Heist. 2003. Genetic heterogeneity among blacktip shark, Carcharhinus limbatus, continental nurseries along the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico. Mar. Biol., 143: 1039–1046.spa
dc.relation.referencesKindsvater, H.K., G.G. Rosenthal y S.H. Alonzo. 2012. Maternal Size and Age Shape Offspring Size in a Live-Bearing Fish, Xhiphorus birchmanni. PLoS one, 7:1-8.spa
dc.relation.referencesKinney, M.J. y C.A. Simpfendorfer. 2009. Reassessing the value of nursery areas to shark conservation and management. Conserv. Lett., 2: 53-60.spa
dc.relation.referencesKinney, M.J. 2011. The communal nursery area paradigm revisited: niche overlap versusniche separtion amoung juvenile shark species of Cleveland Bay. PhD thesis, James Cook University, Queensland. 211 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesKinney, M.J., N.E. Hussey, A.T. Fisk, A.J. Tobin y C.A. Simpfendorfer. 2011. Communal or competetitive? Stable isotope analysis provides evidence of resource partitioning within a communal shark nursery. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 439: 263-276.spa
dc.relation.referencesKlimley, A.P., S.B. Butler, D.R. Nelson y A.T. Stull. 1988. Diel movements of scalloped hammerhead sharks, Sphyrna tiburo Griffith and Smith, to and from a seamount in the Gulf of California. J. Fish Biol., 33: 751-761spa
dc.relation.referencesKnip, D.M., M.R. Heupel y C.A. Simpfendorfer. 2012. Evaluating marine protected areas for the conservation of tropical coastal sharks, Biol. Conserv., 148: 200-209.spa
dc.relation.referencesKohler, N.E., J.G. Casey, y P.A. Turner. 1998. NMFS Cooperative Shark Tagging Program, 1962–93: an atlas of shark tag and recapture data. Mar. Fish. Rev., 60: 1-87.spa
dc.relation.referencesLaw, R. 2007. Fisheries-induced evolution: present status and future directions. Mar.Ecol. Prog. Ser., 335: 271-277.spa
dc.relation.referencesLucifora, L.O., V.B. Garcia y B. Worm. 2011. Global diversity hotspots and conservation priorities for sharks, PLoS one, 6: 1-7.spa
dc.relation.referencesMagnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. 2007. Blue book. https://media.fisheries.noaa.gov/dam-migration/msa-amended-2007.pdf. 18/07/2023.spa
dc.relation.referencesManire, C.A., L.E.L. Rasmussen, D.L. Hess y R.E. Hueter. 1995. Serum steroid hormones and the reproductive cycle of the female bonnethead shark, Sphyrna tiburo. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol., 97: 366–376.spa
dc.relation.referencesMatich, P., C.L. Bigelow, B. Chambers, J.J. Dodds, J.A. Hebert, A. Lemieux, C.M. Pittman, J. Trapp, B. Bianco, C.P. Cadena, E.I. Castillo, G.I. Castillo, A. Dawdy, A.I. Dominguez, N. Dominique, D.R. French, C.F. Glenn, E.C.H. Jackson, B. Johnson, G. Kohl, C. Manka, J.K. Martin, M. Pappas, A.J. Reedholm, K.M. Snead, M.K. Tyree y M. Fisher. 2022. Delineation of blacktip shark (Carcharhinus limbatus) nursery habitats in the north-western Gulf of Mexico. J. Fish Biol., 101: 236–248.spa
dc.relation.referencesMcAuley, R.B., C.A. Simpfendorfer, y I.W. Wright. 2007. Gillnet mesh selectivity of the sandbar shark (Carcharhinus plumbeus): implications for fisheries management. – ICES J. Mar. Sci., 64: 1702–1709.spa
dc.relation.referencesMcKibben, J.N. y D.R Nelson. 1986. Patterns of movement and grouping of gray reef sharks, Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos, at Enewetak, Marshall Islands. Bull. Mar. Sci., 38: 89-110.spa
dc.relation.referencesMeek, A. 1916. The migrations of fish. Edward Arnold, Nature, London. 427 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesMonteforte, S., S. Cattelan, C. Morosinotto, A. Pilastro y A. Grapputo. 2020. Maternal predatpr-exposure affects offspring size at birth but not telomere lenght in a live-bearing fish. Ecol. Evol., 10:2030-2039.spa
dc.relation.referencesMullins, L.L., J.M. Drymon, M. Moore, A. Skarke, A. Moore, y J.C. Rodgers. 2021. Defining distribution and habitat use of west‐central Florida’s coastal sharks through a research and education program. Ecol. Evol., 11: 16055-16069.spa
dc.relation.referencesMusick, J.A., G Burgess, G. Calliet, M. Camhi y S. Fordham. 2000. Management of Sharks and Their Relatives (Elasmobranchii). Fisheries. 25(3): 9-13.spa
dc.relation.referencesMyers, R., J.K. Baum, T.D. Shepered, S. Powers y C.H. Peterson. 2007. Cascading effects of the loss of apex predatory sharks from a coastal ocean. Science, 315: 1846-1850.spa
dc.relation.referencesMyrberg, A.A. y S.H. Gruber. 1974. The Behavior of the Bonnethead Shark, Sphyrna tiburo. Copeia., 2: 358-374.spa
dc.relation.referencesNational Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). 2003. Stock assessment and fishery evaluation for Atlantic highly migratory species. U.S. Department Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Marine Fisheries Service, Silver Spring, Maryland. https://media.fisheries.noaa.gov/2021-04/SAFE%20Report_042121_final.pdf?null. 26/05/2022.spa
dc.relation.referencesNational Centers of Environmental Information (NCEI). 2023. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Monthly Drought Report. www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/monthly-report/drought. 17/09/2023.spa
dc.relation.referencesParsons, G.R. 1993. Geographic variation in reproduction between two populations of the bonnethead shark, Sphyrna tiburo. Environ. Biol. Fishes, 38: 25-35.spa
dc.relation.referencesParsons, G.R. y E.R. Hoffmayer. 2007. Identification and characterization of shark nursery grounds along the Mississippi and Alabama Gulf Coasts. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp., 50: 301−316.spa
dc.relation.referencesPinellas County Department of Environmental and Infrastructure (DEI). 2011. Comprehensive conservation and management plan for Clearwater Harbor and Saint Joseph Sound. Janicki Environmental, Clearwater. 100 pspa
dc.relation.referencesPollom, R., J. Carlson, P. Charvet, C. Avalos, J. Bizarro, M.P. Blanco-Parra, A. Briones Bell-lloc, M.I. Burgos-Vázquez, D. Cardenosa, A. Cevallos, D. Derrick, E. Espinoza, M. Espinoza, P.A. Mejía-Falla, J.M. Morales-Saldaña, A.F. Navia, N. Pacoureau, J.C. Pérez Jiménez y O. Sosa-Nishizaki 2021. Sphyrna tiburo (amended version of 2020 assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2021: e.T39387A205765567. 16 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesPratt, H.L. y J.C. Carrier. 2001. A review of elasmobranch reproductive behavior with a case study on the nurse shark, Ginglymostoma cirratum. Environ Biol Fishes, 60: 157-188.spa
dc.relation.referencesPowter, D.M. y W. Gladstone. 2009. Habitat-mediated use of space by juvenile and mating adult Port Jackson sharks, Heterodontus portusjacksoni, in Eastern Australia. Pac. Sci., 63: 1-14.spa
dc.relation.referencesRigby, C.L., J. Carlson, A. Chin, D. Derrick, M. Dicken y N. Pacoureau. 2021. Carcharhinus limbatus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2021: e.T3851A2870736. 17 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesRoberts, C.M. 2000. Selecting marine reserve locations: optimality versus opportunism. Bull. Mar. Sci., 66: 581–592.spa
dc.relation.referencesRomey, W.L. 1995 Position preferences within groups: do whirligigs select positions which balance feeding opportunities with predator avoidance? Behav Ecol Sociobiol., 37: 195-200.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchlaff, A.M., M.R. Heupel y C.A. Simpfendorfer. 2014. Influence of environmental factors on shark and ray movement, behaviour and habitat use: a review. Rev. Fish. Biol. Fish., 24: 1089-1103.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchreck, C.B., W. Contreras-Sanchez y M.S. Fitzpatrick. 2001. Effects of stress on fish reproduction, gamete quality and progeny. Aquaculture, 197: 3-24.spa
dc.relation.referencesSimpfendorfer, C.A. y N.E. Milward. 1993. Utilization of a tropical bay as a nursery area by sharks of the Families Carcharhinidae and Sphyrnidae. Environ. Biol. Fish., 37: 337–345.spa
dc.relation.referencesSims, D.W., J.P. Nash y D. Morritt. 2001. Movements and activity of male and female dogfish in a tidal sea lough: alternative behavioural strategies and apparent sexual segregation. Mar Biol., 139: 1165-1175.spa
dc.relation.referencesSpeed, C.W., M.G. Meekan, I.C. Field, C.R. McMahon, J.D. Stevens, F. McGregor, C. Huveneers, Y. Berger, C.J.A. Bradshaw. 2011. Spatial and temporal movement patterns of a muti-species coastal reef shark aggregation. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 429: 261-275.spa
dc.relation.referencesSpringer, S. 1967. Social organization of shark Populations.149-174. En: Gilbert, P.W., R.F. Mathewson y D.P Rall (Ed.) Sharks, Skates, and Rays, John Hopkins Press, Baltimore. 624p.spa
dc.relation.referencesStandora, E. A. y D.R. Nelson. 1977. A telemetric study of the behavior of free swimming Pacific angel sharks Squatina californica. Bull. S. Calif. Acad. Sci., 76: 193-201.spa
dc.relation.referencesStevens, J., R. Bonfil, N. Dulvy y P. Walker. 2000. The effects of fishing on sharks, rays chimaeras (Chondrichthyans), and the implications for marine ecosystems. ICES. J. Mar. Sci., 57: 476-494.spa
dc.relation.referencesSturges, H. 1926. The choice of a class-interval. J. Am. Statist. Assoc., 21: 65-66.spa
dc.relation.referencesUlrich, G.F., C.M. Jones, W.B. Driggers, J.M. Drymon, D. Oakley y C. Riley. 2007. Habitat utilization, relative abundance, and seasonality of sharks in the estuarine and nearshore waters of South Carolina. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp., 50: 125-139.spa
dc.relation.referencesWheeler, C.R., J.D. Rummer, B. Bailey, J. Lockwood, S. Vance y J.W. Mandelman. 2021. Future termal regimes for Epaulette sharks (Hemiscyllium ocellatum): growth and metabolic performance cease to be optimal. Sci. Rep., 11: 454-466.spa
dc.relation.referencesWhitney, N.M., H.L. Pratt y J.C. Carrier 2004. Group courtship, mating behaviour and siphon sac function in the whitetip reef shark, Triaenodon obesus. Anim. Behav., 68: 1435−1442.spa
dc.relation.referencesWiley, T.R. y C.A. Simpfendorfer. 2007. The ecology of elasmobranchs occurring in The Everglades National Park, Florida: implications for conservation and management. Bull. Mar. Sci., 80: 171–189.spa
dc.relation.referencesZar, J.H. 2010. Biostatistical analysis Fifth Edition. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA. 957p.spa
dc.subjectÁreas de agregación
dc.subjectSegregación sexual
dc.subjectIslas de barrera
dc.subjectHábitats estuarinos
dc.subjectÁreas de crianzaspa
dc.subject.keywordAggregation area
dc.subject.keywordSexual segregation
dc.subject.keywordBarrier islands
dc.subject.keywordEstuarine habitats
dc.subject.keywordNursery areaspa
dc.subject.lembTiburones - Hábitats
dc.subject.lembÁreas de crianza (Zoología) - Evaluación
dc.subject.lembComportamiento animal - Segregación sexual
dc.titleResidencia multianual de tres especies de tiburones (Carcharhinus limbatus, C. acronotus y Sphyrna tiburo) en la costa centro occidental de Florida : ¿posible área de crianza?spa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1spa

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Rivera-Salguero (2024) Residencia multianual de 3 sp de tibs en la costa centro occidental de FL área de crianza.pdf
Tamaño:
1.6 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Ver documento

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
2.87 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
FOR-EFE-GDB-007_AUTORIZACION_DE_PUBLICACION_DE_TESIS_O_TRABAJO_DE_GRADO.pdf
Tamaño:
277.96 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Carta de Autorización

Colecciones