Tendencias, avances y desafíos de las pequeñas centrales hidroeléctricas: una revisión sistemática con aplicación complementaria en una micro hidroeléctrica
| dc.contributor.advisor | Aristizbal Cardona, Andres Julian | |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Banguero Palacios, Edinson | |
| dc.creator | Renteria Palacios, Jackson Yair | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-02-19T14:53:57Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2026-02-04 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Este trabajo presenta una revisión exhaustiva de la literatura científica reciente sobre pequeñas centrales hidroeléctricas (2014–2026), abordando seis ejes temáticos: tecnologías aplicadas, costos, modelado, tendencias en el mercado, políticas y regulación, e impactos ambientales. Los resultados muestran que la evolución de las PCH se caracteriza por mejoras en eficiencia hidráulica, modularidad, automatización y reducción de costos, acompañadas del uso creciente de herramientas de simulación para optimizar el diseño y la operación de estos sistemas. Paralelamente, se evidencia que, pese a tener un perfil de impacto relativamente bajo, las PCH pueden generar alteraciones importantes en caudales ecológicos, conectividad fluvial y biodiversidad, especialmente cuando se instalan múltiples proyectos en una misma cuenca. Además, como aplicación práctica de los conceptos revisados, se desarrolló el caso de estudio de la Micro Central Hidroeléctrica Juntas del Tamaná, ubicada en una zona rural del municipio de Nóvita (Chocó). El análisis incluyó la descripción técnica de la infraestructura hidráulica y electromecánica, y la propuesta de un sistema completo de telemetría para monitorear caudal, variables eléctricas y parámetros ambientales mediante sensores especializados. De esta manera, el estudio ofrece una visión holística del estado actual de las PCH, identifica oportunidades para mejorar su sostenibilidad técnica y ambiental, y resalta el papel crucial de estas tecnologías en la electrificación rural y la transición energética. | |
| dc.description.abstractenglish | This paper presents a comprehensive review of recent scientific literature on small hydroelectric power plants (2014–2026), addressing six thematic areas: applied technologies, costs, modeling, market trends, policies and regulations, and environmental impacts. The results show that the evolution of small hydroelectric plants is characterized by improvements in hydraulic efficiency, modularity, automation, and cost reduction, accompanied by the increasing use of simulation tools to optimize the design and operation of these systems. At the same time, it is evident that, despite having a relatively low impact profile, small hydroelectric plants can generate significant alterations in ecological flows, river connectivity, and biodiversity, especially when multiple projects are installed in the same watershed. Furthermore, as a practical application of the reviewed concepts, a case study was developed of the Juntas del Tamaná Micro Hydroelectric Plant, located in a rural area of the municipality of Nóvita (Chocó). The analysis included a technical description of the hydraulic and electromechanical infrastructure, and a proposal for a complete telemetry system to monitor flow rate, electrical variables, and environmental parameters using specialized sensors. In this way, the study offers a holistic view of the current state of small hydropower plants (SHPs), identifies opportunities to improve their technical and environmental sustainability, and highlights the crucial role of these technologies in rural electrification and the energy transition. | |
| dc.format.extent | 35 páginas | |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12010/39292 | |
| dc.language.iso | es | |
| dc.relation.references | Abdullah, Z. T., & Glasscock, J. A. (2025). Quantitative sustainability assessment of a micro-hydropower system: case study of the Mesopotamia sedimentary plain. Results in Engineering, 28, 107445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107445 | |
| dc.relation.references | Akorede, M. F. (2022). Design and performance analysis of off-grid hybrid renewable energy systems. In Hybrid Technologies for Power Generation (pp. 35–68). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823793-9.00001-2 | |
| dc.relation.references | Ali, S., Stewart, R. A., Sahin, O., & Vieira, A. S. (2023). Integrated GIS-AHP-based approach for off-river pumped hydro energy storage site selection. Applied Energy, 337, 120914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120914 | |
| dc.relation.references | Allouhi, A. (2024). A hybrid PV/wind/battery energy system to assist a run-of-river micro-hydropower for clean electrification and fuelling hydrogen mobility for young population in a rural Moroccan site. Journal of Cleaner Production, 442, 140852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140852 | |
| dc.relation.references | Athayde, S., Duarte, C. G., Gallardo, A. L. C. F., Moretto, E. M., Sangoi, L. A., Dibo, A. P. A., Siqueira-Gay, J., & Sánchez, L. E. (2019). Improving policies and instruments to address cumulative impacts of small hydropower in the Amazon. Energy Policy, 132, 265–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.05.003 | |
| dc.relation.references | Atkins, E. (2020). Contesting the ‘greening’ of hydropower in the Brazilian Amazon. Political Geography, 80, 102179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102179 | |
| dc.relation.references | Azimov, U., & Avezova, N. (2022). Sustainable small-scale hydropower solutions in Central Asian countries for local and cross-border energy/water supply. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 167, 112726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112726 | |
| dc.relation.references | Bayazıt, Y., Bakış, R., & Koç, C. (2017). An investigation of small scale hydropower plants using the geographic information system. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 67, 289–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.062 | |
| dc.relation.references | Bekker, A., Van Dijk, M., & Niebuhr, C. M. (2022). A review of low head hydropower at wastewater treatment works and development of an evaluation framework for South Africa. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 159, 112216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112216 | |
| dc.relation.references | Caetano, N. S., Martins, F. F., & Oliveira, G. M. (2024). Life cycle assessment of renewable energy technologies. In The Renewable Energy-Water-Environment Nexus (pp. 37–79). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-13439-5.00002-8 | |
| dc.relation.references | Carolli, M., Garcia de Leaniz, C., Jones, J., Belletti, B., Huđek, H., Pusch, M., Pandakov, P., Börger, L., & van de Bund, W. (2023). Impacts of existing and planned hydropower dams on river fragmentation in the Balkan Region. Science of The Total Environment, 871, 161940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161940 | |
| dc.relation.references | Carvalho, N. B., Berrêdo Viana, D., Muylaert de Araújo, M. S., Lampreia, J., Gomes, M. S. P., & Freitas, M. A. V. (2020). How likely is Brazil to achieve its NDC commitments in the energy sector? A review on Brazilian low-carbon energy perspectives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 133, 110343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110343 | |
| dc.relation.references | Chen, J., & Engeda, A. (2020). Standard module hydraulic technology: A novel geometrical design methodology and analysis for a low-head hydraulic turbine system, Part I: General design methodology and basic geometry considerations. Energy, 196, 117151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117151 | |
| dc.relation.references | Costa, A. S., Rocha, A. E. F., Saavedra, O. R., Assireu, A. T., & Pimenta, F. M. (2026). Assessment of tidal current energy resources for electricity generation in the São Marcos estuary - Brazil. Ocean Engineering, 343, 123185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.123185 | |
| dc.relation.references | Deveci, M., Cali, U., Kucuksari, S., & Erdogan, N. (2020). Interval type-2 fuzzy sets based multi-criteria decision-making model for offshore wind farm development in Ireland. Energy, 198, 117317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117317 | |
| dc.relation.references | Duran, A. S., & Sahinyazan, F. G. (2021). An analysis of renewable mini-grid projects for rural electrification. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 77, 100999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2020.100999 | |
| dc.relation.references | Đurin, B., Plantak, L., Lajqi, S., & Kranjčić, N. (2022). Insight into the potential of the energy production by hybrid systems: small hydropower and solar photovoltaics. In Complementarity of Variable Renewable Energy Sources (pp. 427–438). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85527-3.00017-0 | |
| dc.relation.references | Fernandez Vazquez, C. A. A., Mendoza Paz, S., Hannotte, A., Balderrama, S., Crespo del Granado, P., & Quoilin, S. (2026). Integrating climate-driven hydropower variability into long-term energy planning: A Bolivian case study under El Niño and La Niña scenarios. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 226, 116250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.116250 | |
| dc.relation.references | Ferreira, J. H. I., Camacho, J. R., Malagoli, J. A., & Júnior, S. C. G. (2016). Assessment of the potential of small hydropower development in Brazil. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 56, 380–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.035 | |
| dc.relation.references | Franco, A., Shaker, M., Kalubi, D., & Hostettler, S. (2017). A review of sustainable energy access and technologies for healthcare facilities in the Global South. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 22, 92–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2017.02.022 | |
| dc.relation.references | Gao, H., Qi, X., Lin, Z., Li, M., Liu, G., Lv, Y., Khan, S., & Wu, N. (2025). Impact of small hydropower plants on microbial community structure and functions in benthic biofilms. Journal of Environmental Management, 392, 126869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126869 | |
| dc.relation.references | Gasparatos, A., Doll, C. N. H., Esteban, M., Ahmed, A., & Olang, T. A. (2017). Renewable energy and biodiversity: Implications for transitioning to a Green Economy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70, 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.030 | |
| dc.relation.references | He, M., Niu, J., Liu, D., Wu, P., & Hu, B. X. (2025). Remote sensing in river obstruction research: A bibliometric analysis integrated with large language model. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 62, 102850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102850 | |
| dc.relation.references | Hedger, R. D., Kenawi, M. S., Sundt-Hansen, L. E., Bakken, T. H., & Sandercock, B. K. (2025). Evaluating environmental impacts of micro, mini and small hydropower plants in Norway. Journal of Environmental Management, 373, 123521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123521 | |
| dc.relation.references | Idiaghe, L. (2018). Legislation on Hydropower Use and Development. In Sustainable Hydropower in West Africa (pp. 159–187). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813016-2.00011-3 | |
| dc.relation.references | Kong, Y., Kong, Z., Liu, Z., Wei, C., & An, G. (2016). Substituting small hydropower for fuel: The practice of China and the sustainable development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 65, 978–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.07.056 | |
| dc.relation.references | Kumar, K., & Saini, R. P. (2022). Economic analysis of operation and maintenance costs of hydropower plants. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 53, 102704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102704 | |
| dc.relation.references | Kumar, S., & Madlener, R. (2016). CO2 emission reduction potential assessment using renewable energy in India. Energy, 97, 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.12.131 | |
| dc.relation.references | Kuriqi, A., Pinheiro, A. N., Sordo-Ward, A., Bejarano, M. D., & Garrote, L. (2021). Ecological impacts of run-of-river hydropower plants—Current status and future prospects on the brink of energy transition. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 142, 110833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110833 | |
| dc.relation.references | Laks, I., Walczak, Z., & Walczak, N. (2023). Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process methods in changing the damming level of a small hydropower plant: Case study of Rosko SHP in Poland. Water Resources and Industry, 29, 100204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wri.2023.100204 | |
| dc.relation.references | Li, X., Chen, Z., Fan, X., & Cheng, Z. (2018). Hydropower development situation and prospects in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 232–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.090 | |
| dc.relation.references | Li, X., Liu, P., Feng, M., Jordaan, S. M., Cheng, L., Ming, B., Chen, J., Xie, K., & Liu, W. (2024). Energy transition paradox: Solar and wind growth can hinder decarbonization. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 192, 114220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.114220 | |
| dc.relation.references | Lin, Z., Zheng, Y., Qi, X., Zheng, Q., Duan, Y., Gao, H., Liu, G., Wang, Y., Shi, J., Khan, S., & Wu, N. (2025). Small hydropower plants alter the assembly mechanisms and environmental drivers of macroinvertebrate communities in different sections. Global Ecology and Conservation, 62, e03718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03718 | |
| dc.relation.references | Mahmud, M. A. P., Huda, N., Farjana, S. H., & Lang, C. (2019). A strategic impact assessment of hydropower plants in alpine and non-alpine areas of Europe. Applied Energy, 250, 198–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.05.007 | |
| dc.relation.references | Ming, Z., Shaojie, O., Hui, S., Yujian, G., & Qiqi, Q. (2015). Overall review of distributed energy development in China: Status quo, barriers and solutions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 50, 1226–1238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.065 | |
| dc.relation.references | Mishra, M. K., Khare, N., & Agrawal, A. B. (2015). Small hydro power in India: Current status and future perspectives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 51, 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.075 | |
| dc.relation.references | Motahari, S., & Rahimpour, M. R. (2024). Hydro and Wind-Based Cogeneration Technologies. In Encyclopedia of Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (pp. 339–346). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-93940-9.00196-1 | |
| dc.relation.references | Mukhopadhyay, A., Hati, J. P., Acharyya, R., Pal, I., Tuladhar, N., & Habel, M. (2025). Global trends in using the InVEST model suite and related research: A systematic review. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, 25(2), 389–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecohyd.2024.06.002 | |
| dc.relation.references | Nedaei, A., Aghaei, M., Eskandari, A., Maurer, F., & Cali, U. (2025). Digital twins for hydropower applications. In Digital Twin Technology for the Energy Sector (pp. 213–234). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-14070-9.00010-X | |
| dc.relation.references | Nguyen, P. A., Abbott, M., & Nguyen, T. L. T. (2019). The development and cost of renewable energy resources in Vietnam. Utilities Policy, 57, 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2019.01.009 | |
| dc.relation.references | Olivares, M. A., Lillo, R., & Haas, J. (2021). Grid-wide assessment of varying re-regulation storage capacity for hydropeaking mitigation. Journal of Environmental Management, 293, 112866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112866 | |
| dc.relation.references | Othman, M. E. F., Sidek, L. M., Basri, H., El-Shafie, A., & Ahmed, A. N. (2025). Climate challenges for sustainable hydropower development and operational resilience: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 209, 115108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.115108 | |
| dc.relation.references | Otto, C., Louloudis, G., Roumpos, C., Mertiri, E., Ernst, P., & Kempka, T. (2026). Economic feasibility of Pumped Hydropower Storage in a European open-pit lignite mine. Energy Conversion and Management, 347, 120491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2025.120491 | |
| dc.relation.references | Piper, A. T., Rosewarne, P. J., Wright, R. M., & Kemp, P. S. (2018). The impact of an Archimedes screw hydropower turbine on fish migration in a lowland river. Ecological Engineering, 118, 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.04.009 | |
| dc.relation.references | Punys, P. (2025). Computer-based tools for assessment of small-scale hydropower resources and project feasibility: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 216, 115717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.115717 | |
| dc.relation.references | Puschnigg, S., Patauner, D., Böhm, H., Doujak, E., & Müller, C. (2025). Digitalization and hydropower integration in water supply systems: Unlocking energy potential, efficiency, and resilience. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 29, 101098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2025.101098 | |
| dc.relation.references | Qi, X., Lin, Z., Gao, H., Li, M., Duan, Y., Liu, G., Khan, S., Mu, H., Messyasz, B., & Wu, N. (2024). Small hydropower plants affect aquatic community diversity: A longitudinal study under ecological flow. Journal of Environmental Management, 370, 122987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122987 | |
| dc.relation.references | Raja Abd Jalil, R. F., Chong, K. L., Huang, Y. F., Abdul Malek, M. B., Elkollaly, M., Sherif, M., El-Shafie, A., & Ahmed, A. N. (2026). Advancing climate change impact assessment on global hydropower systems: Methodologies, models, and recommendations. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 226, 116364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.116364 | |
| dc.relation.references | Safdar, I., Sultan, S., Raza, H. A., Umer, M., & Ali, M. (2020). Empirical analysis of turbine and generator efficiency of a pico hydro system. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 37, 100605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2019.100605 | |
| dc.relation.references | Sasthav, C., & Oladosu, G. (2022). Environmental design of low-head run-of-river hydropower in the United States: A review of facility design models. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 160, 112312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112312 | |
| dc.relation.references | Scotti, A., & Bottarin, R. (2021). Fine-scale multiannual survey of benthic invertebrates in a glacier-fed stream used for hydropower generation. Scientific Data, 8(1), 105. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-00887-x | |
| dc.relation.references | Shiji, C., Dhakal, S., & Ou, C. (2021). Greening small hydropower: A brief review. Energy Strategy Reviews, 36, 100676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2021.100676 | |
| dc.relation.references | Singh, V. K., & Singal, S. K. (2017). Operation of hydro power plants-a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69, 610–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.169 | |
| dc.relation.references | Sofi, M. S., Hamid, A., Bhat, S. U., Rashid, I., & Kuniyal, J. C. (2022). Biotic alteration of benthic macroinvertebrate communities based on multispatial-scale environmental variables in a regulated river system of Kashmir Himalaya. Ecological Engineering, 177, 106560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106560 | |
| dc.relation.references | Spänhoff, B. (2014). Current status and future prospects of hydropower in Saxony (Germany) compared to trends in Germany, the European Union and the World. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 30, 518–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.10.035 | |
| dc.relation.references | Spasenic, Z., Makajic-Nikolic, D., & Benkovic, S. (2022). Risk assessment of financing renewable energy projects: A case study of financing a small hydropower plant project in Serbia. Energy Reports, 8, 8437–8450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.06.065 | |
| dc.relation.references | Suraparaju, S. K., Samykano, M., Vennapusa, J. R., Rajamony, R. K., Balasubramanian, D., Said, Z., & Pandey, A. K. (2025). Challenges and prospectives of energy storage integration in renewable energy systems for net zero transition. Journal of Energy Storage, 125, 116923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2025.116923 | |
| dc.relation.references | Tahseen, S., & Karney, B. W. (2017). Reviewing and critiquing published approaches to the sustainability assessment of hydropower. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 67, 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.031 | |
| dc.relation.references | Tazikeh, S., Mohammadzadeh, O., Zendehboudi, S., Saady, N. M. C., Albayati, T. M., & Chatzis, I. (2025). Energy development and management in the Middle East: A holistic analysis. Energy Conversion and Management, 323, 119124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119124 | |
| dc.relation.references | Tefera, W. M., & Kasiviswanathan, K. S. (2022). A global-scale hydropower potential assessment and feasibility evaluations. Water Resources and Economics, 38, 100198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wre.2022.100198 | |
| dc.relation.references | Teffera, B., Assefa, B., & Assefa, G. (2020). Assessing the life cycle environmental impacts of hydroelectric generation in Ethiopia. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 41, 100795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2020.100795 | |
| dc.relation.references | Tiwari, G., Kumar, J., Prasad, V., & Patel, V. K. (2020). Utility of CFD in the design and performance analysis of hydraulic turbines — A review. Energy Reports, 6, 2410–2429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.09.004 | |
| dc.relation.references | Ugwu, C. O., Ozor, P. A., & Mbohwa, C. (2022). Small hydropower as a source of clean and local energy in Nigeria: Prospects and challenges. Fuel Communications, 10, 100046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfueco.2021.100046 | |
| dc.relation.references | Uniyal, V., Karn, A., & Singh, V. P. (2025). Comparative life cycle assessment of micro water Turbines: Evaluating potential for remote power generation. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 73, 104107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2024.104107 | |
| dc.relation.references | Virah-Sawmy, D., & Sturmberg, B. (2025). Socio-economic and environmental impacts of renewable energy deployments: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 207, 114956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114956 | |
| dc.relation.references | Wang, D., Wang, X., Huang, Y., Zhang, X., Zhang, W., Xin, Y., Qu, M., & Cao, Z. (2021). Impact analysis of small hydropower construction on river connectivity on the upper reaches of the great rivers in the Tibetan Plateau. Global Ecology and Conservation, 26, e01496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01496 | |
| dc.relation.references | Xu, J., & Ni, T. (2017). Integrated technological paradigm-based soft paths towards sustainable development of small hydropower. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70, 623–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.021 | |
| dc.relation.references | Yah, N. F., Oumer, A. N., & Idris, M. S. (2017). Small scale hydro-power as a source of renewable energy in Malaysia: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72, 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.068 | |
| dc.relation.references | Yu, B., & Xu, L. (2016). Review of ecological compensation in hydropower development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55, 729–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.038 | |
| dc.relation.references | Yu, B., Xu, L., & Yang, Z. (2016). Ecological compensation for inundated habitats in hydropower developments based on carbon stock balance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 334–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.071 | |
| dc.relation.references | Zahedi, R., Ahmadi, A., & Gitifar, S. (2022). Reduction of the environmental impacts of the hydropower plant by microalgae cultivation and biodiesel production. Journal of Environmental Management, 304, 114247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114247 | |
| dc.relation.references | Zhang, C., Chen, S., Qiao, H., Dong, L., Huang, Z., & Ou, C. (2020). Small hydropower sustainability evaluation for the countries along the Belt and Road. Environmental Development, 34, 100528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2020.100528 | |
| dc.relation.references | Zhou, Y., Chang, L.-C., Uen, T.-S., Guo, S., Xu, C.-Y., & Chang, F.-J. (2019). Prospect for small-hydropower installation settled upon optimal water allocation: An action to stimulate synergies of water-food-energy nexus. Applied Energy, 238, 668–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.069 | |
| dc.subject | Pequeña hidroeléctrica | |
| dc.subject | Micro hidroeléctrica | |
| dc.subject | Impactos ambientales | |
| dc.subject | Modelos | |
| dc.subject | Tendencias globales | |
| dc.subject | Políticas | |
| dc.subject | Tecnologías | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Small hydropower | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Micro hydropower | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Environmental impacts | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Models | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Global trends | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Policies | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Technologies | |
| dc.subject.lemb | Centrales hidroeléctricas pequeñas | |
| dc.subject.lemb | Energía hidroeléctrica - Aspectos ambientales | |
| dc.subject.lemb | Electrificación rural - Colombia | |
| dc.title | Tendencias, avances y desafíos de las pequeñas centrales hidroeléctricas: una revisión sistemática con aplicación complementaria en una micro hidroeléctrica | |
| dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bc |
Archivos
Bloque original
1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
- Nombre:
- Tendencias, avances y desafíos de las pequeñas centrales hidroeléctricas.pdf
- Tamaño:
- 346.15 KB
- Formato:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Descripción:
- Tesis