Evaluación de la factibilidad económica de la implementación de actividades de mantenimiento por condición en paneles solares de una granja fotovoltaica de 10 MW, considerando el impacto del indicador %PR en Celsia Colombia.

dc.contributor.advisorSantana Viloria, Leonardo Gerardo
dc.creatorGallo Lopez, Andres Felipe
dc.creatorSalas Reyes, Jaime Humberto
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-15T16:37:16Z
dc.date.created2025-12-06
dc.description.abstractEl estudio analiza la factibilidad económica de implementar mantenimiento por condición en paneles solares de una granja fotovoltaica de 10 MW en Celsia Colombia, evaluando su impacto en el indicador %PR (Performance Ratio). Se busca determinar si esta estrategia mejora la eficiencia operativa y reduce costos en comparación con el mantenimiento tradicional. Actualmente, Celsia no tiene claridad sobre el impacto técnico-económico del mantenimiento por condición en sus módulos solares. Datos históricos de la Granja Solar Yumbo muestran variaciones en el %PR, influenciadas por la frecuencia de lavados. Según la literatura, un mantenimiento óptimo puede elevar el %PR hasta un 88%, lo que sugiere un potencial de mejora del 10-15%. El estudio revisa la evolución de estrategias de mantenimiento, desde enfoques reactivos hasta métodos avanzados basados en análisis de datos e inteligencia artificial. Se destacan tecnologías como sensores de suciedad, monitoreo por imagen y modelos predictivos que optimizan las intervenciones y reducen costos operativos. Investigaciones previas sugieren que el mantenimiento predictivo puede reducir tiempos de inactividad en un 25% y aumentar la generación de energía en un 3%. Los resultados esperados incluyen la optimización del %PR, la reducción de costos operativos y la mejora en la confiabilidad de los activos fotovoltaicos. La evaluación permitirá determinar si la implementación del mantenimiento por condición es viable y beneficiosa para Celsia, alineando esta estrategia con la gestión estratégica y los KPI de la empresa.
dc.description.abstractenglishThis study analyzes the economic feasibility of implementing condition-based maintenance on solar panels at a 10 MW photovoltaic farm owned by Celsia Colombia, evaluating its impact on the Performance Ratio (%PR). The aim is to determine if this strategy improves operational efficiency and reduces costs compared to traditional maintenance. Currently, Celsia lacks clarity regarding the technical and economic impact of condition-based maintenance on its solar modules. Historical data from the Yumbo Solar Farm show variations in the %PR, influenced by the frequency of washing. According to the literature, optimal maintenance can increase the %PR by up to 88%, suggesting a potential improvement of 10-15%. The study reviews the evolution of maintenance strategies, from reactive approaches to advanced methods based on data analysis and artificial intelligence. It highlights technologies such as dirt sensors, image monitoring, and predictive models that optimize interventions and reduce operating costs. Previous research suggests that predictive maintenance can reduce downtime by 25% and increase energy generation by 3%. Expected results include optimized uptime percentage (%PR), reduced operating costs, and improved reliability of photovoltaic assets. The evaluation will determine whether implementing condition-based maintenance is viable and beneficial for Celsia, aligning this strategy with the company's strategic management and KPIs.
dc.format.extent77 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12010/38793
dc.language.isoes
dc.relation.referencesAbdulla, H., Sleptchenko, A., & Nayfeh, A. (2024). Photovoltaic systems operation and maintenance: A review and future directions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 185, 113456. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124000650
dc.relation.referencesAbuín, J. R. (2007). Regresión lineal múltiple. IdEyGdM-Ld Estadística.
dc.relation.referencesAhmed, M., Seraj, R., & Islam, S. M. S. (2020). The k-means algorithm: A comprehensive survey and performance evaluation. Electronics, 9(8), 1295. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/9/8/1295
dc.relation.referencesAlshareef, M. J. (2023). A comprehensive review of the soiling effects on PV module performance. IEEE Access, 11, 134623–134651. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375968387_A_comprehensive_review_of_the_soiling_ effects_on_PV_Module_Performance
dc.relation.referencesBox, G. E. P., & Tiao, G. C. (1975). Intervention analysis with applications to economic and environmental problems. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70(349), 70–79. https://alnap.cdn.ngo/media/documents/box-tiao1975.pdf
dc.relation.referencesCelsia. (2018). Paneles solares: ¿Cómo funcionan y qué son? https://www.celsia.com/es/blog-celsia/paneles-solares-como-funcionan-y-que-son/
dc.relation.referencesChiteka, K., Arora, R., Sridhara, S. N., & Enweremadu, C. C. (2020). A novel approach to solar PV cleaning frequency optimisation for soiling mitigation. Scientific African, 8, e00459. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468227620301976
dc.relation.referencesCosta, S. C., Diniz, A. S. A., & Kazmerski, L. L. (2018). Solar energy dust and soiling R&D progress: Literature review update for 2016. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 2504–2536. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1364032117312406
dc.relation.referencesFthenakis, V. M., & Kim, H. C. (2011). Photovoltaics: Life-cycle analyses. Solar Energy, 80(4), 443–456. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0038092X09002345
dc.relation.referencesGackowiec, P. (2019). General overview of maintenance strategies: Concepts and approaches. Multidisciplinary Aspects of Production Engineering, 2, 126–139. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/General-overview-of-maintenance-strategies–-andGackowiec/9dfbda19ad80c2e237e68f5c45ea213cdf3c2960
dc.relation.referencesGøran, S. (2022). Optimising maintenance operations in photovoltaic solar plants using data analysis for predictive maintenance [Master’s thesis]. Norwegian University of Life Sciences. https://nmbu.brage.unit.no/nmbu-xmlui/handle/11250/3027040
dc.relation.referencesGuney, I., Onat, N., & Ng, A. (2010). Cost calculation algorithm for photovoltaic systems. In Paths to sustainable energy (pp. 211–236). https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/9530
dc.relation.referencesHøiaas, I., Grujic, K., Imenes, A. G., Burud, I., Olsen, E., & Belbachir, N. (2022). Inspection and condition monitoring of large-scale photovoltaic power plants: A review of imaging technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 161, 112353. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032122002647
dc.relation.referencesHyndman, R. J., & Athanasopoulos, G. (2021). Forecasting: Principles and practice (3rd ed.). OTexts. https://otexts.com/fpp3
dc.relation.referencesIDCOL. (2021). Large-scale solar photovoltaic systems: Principles of operation and maintenance. https://idcol.org/social/0257eaaf439a8f6aa721a1f060499a4e.pdf
dc.relation.referencesInternational Energy Agency. (2020). Renewables 2020: Analysis and forecast to 2025. https://www.iea.org/reports/renewables-2020
dc.relation.referencesJordan, D. C., & Kurtz, S. R. (2013). Photovoltaic degradation rates: An analytical review. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 21(1), 12–29. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy12osti/51664.pdf
dc.relation.referencesKeisang, K., Bader, T., & Samikannu, R. (2021). Review of operation and maintenance methodologies for solar photovoltaic microgrids. Frontiers in Energy Research, 9. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenrg.2021.730230/full
dc.relation.referencesKontopoulou, V. I., Panagopoulos, A. D., Kakkos, I., & Matsopoulos, G. K. (2023). A review of ARIMA vs. machine learning approaches for time series forecasting in data-driven networks. Future Internet, 15(8), 255. https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/15/8/255
dc.relation.referencesLivera, A., Theristis, M., Micheli, L., Fernández, E. F., Stein, J. S., & Georghiou, G. E. (2022). Operation and maintenance decision support system for photovoltaic systems. IEEE Access, 10, 42481–42496. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9758804
dc.relation.referencesLópez, F. G. (2021). Operational expenditures model for renewable plant [Master’s thesis]. Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
dc.relation.referencesMellit, A., & Kalogirou, S. A. (2008). Artificial intelligence techniques for photovoltaic applications: A review. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 34(5), 574–632. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360128508000034
dc.relation.referencesMessenger, R. A., & Abtahi, A. (2017). Photovoltaic systems engineering (4th ed.). CRC Press.
dc.relation.referencesMobley, R. K. (2002). An introduction to predictive maintenance. ButterworthHeinemann.
dc.relation.referencesMoubray, J. (2004). Reliability-centered maintenance (2nd ed.). Industrial Press
dc.relation.referencesNational Renewable Energy Laboratory. (2013). Ground-mounted photovoltaic systems: Fixed-tilt versus tracking. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy13osti/58760.pdf
dc.relation.referencesOlorunfemi, B. O., Ogbolumani, O. A., & Nwulu, N. (2022). Solar panels dirt monitoring and cleaning for performance improvement: A systematic review on smart systems. Sustainability, 14(17), 10920. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/10920
dc.relation.referencesOprea, S.-V., Carcadea, E., Raboaca, M. S., Badea, G., Eftene, M., & Pana, C. (2019). Photovoltaic power plants (PV-PP) reliability indicators for improving operation and maintenance activities: A case study of PV-PP Agigea located in Romania. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 55(3), 3068–3076. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8672887
dc.relation.referencesOrosz, T., Rassõlkin, A., Arsénio, P., Poór, P., Valme, D., & Sleisz, Á. (2024). Current challenges in operation, performance, and maintenance of photovoltaic panels. Energies, 17(6), 1306. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/6/1306
dc.relation.referencesPakkiraiah, B., & Sukumar, G. D. (2016). Research survey on various MPPT performance issues to improve the solar PV system efficiency. Journal of Solar Energy, 8012432. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jen/2016/8012432
dc.relation.referencesPascual, D., Pla, F., & Sánchez, S. (2007). Algoritmos de agrupamiento. Métodos Informáticos Avanzados, 164–174.
dc.relation.referencesPatel, M., & Smith, J. (2023). Performance indicators for photovoltaic systems maintenance: An analytical approach. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 230, 111272. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927024821005584
dc.relation.referencesPoór, P., Ženíšek, D., & Basl, J. (2019). Historical overview of maintenance management strategies: Development from breakdown maintenance to predictive maintenance. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335444202
dc.relation.referencesPorter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. https://resource.1st.ir/PortalImageDb/ScientificContent/Competitive%20Advantage.pdf
dc.relation.referencesQureshi, M. S., Umar, S., & Nawaz, M. U. (2024). Machine learning for predictive maintenance in solar farms. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Technology Innovation, 6(1), 32–40. https://ijaeti.com/index.php/Journal/article/view/228
dc.relation.referencesRönnlund, M. (2025). Optimizing photovoltaic systems: KPI analysis and SCADA recommendations [Master’s thesis, Lund University]. https://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=9183854&fileOId=9183855
dc.relation.referencesSanthoshi, B. K., Sundaram, K. M., Padmanaban, S., Holm-Nielsen, J. B., & K. K., P. (2019). Critical review of PV grid-tied inverters. Energies, 12(10), 1921. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/10/1921
dc.relation.referencesSethiya, S. K. (2006). Condition based maintenance (CBM). https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf
dc.relation.referencesSuárez, R., Catota, P., Quishpe, C., Jácome, F., & Valencia, R. (2024). Una revisión de las plataformas IoT utilizadas para el monitoreo en tiempo real de sistemas fotovoltaicos. Nexos Científicos, 8(2), 29–41. https://nexoscientificos.vidanueva.edu.ec/index.php/ojs/article/view/100/329
dc.relation.referencesThe Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica. (2025, October 18). Solar panel. In Encyclopaedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/technology/solar-panel
dc.relation.referencesWalker, H., Lockhart, E., Desai, J., Ardani, K., Klise, G., Lavrova, O., … Pochiraju, A. (2020). Model of operation-and-maintenance costs for photovoltaic systems (NREL/TP-5C00-74840). https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy20osti/74840.pdf
dc.subjectMantenimiento por condición
dc.subjectPerformance Ratio (PR)
dc.subjectPanel solar
dc.subjectEficiencia
dc.subjectCosto
dc.subject.keywordCondition-based maintenance
dc.subject.keywordPerformance Ratio (PR)
dc.subject.keywordSolar panel
dc.subject.keywordEfficiency
dc.subject.keywordCost
dc.subject.lembEnergía solar - Instalaciones fotovoltaicas
dc.subject.lembCentrales de energía solar - Mantenimiento predictivo
dc.subject.lembGeneración de energía eléctrica
dc.titleEvaluación de la factibilidad económica de la implementación de actividades de mantenimiento por condición en paneles solares de una granja fotovoltaica de 10 MW, considerando el impacto del indicador %PR en Celsia Colombia.
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Proyecto final MBA - Andres Gallo Jaime Salas.pdf
Tamaño:
1.42 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Tesis

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
3.28 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
FOR-EFE-GDB-007_AUTORIZACION_DE_PUBLICACION_DE_TESIS_O_TRABAJO_DE_GRADO (1) (2).pdf
Tamaño:
248.49 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Carta de autorización