Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDueñas, Marcos
dc.coverage.spatialBogotá, Colombiaspa
dc.creatorHincapié González, Jorge Mario
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-20T18:21:22Z
dc.date.available2021-05-20T18:21:22Z
dc.date.created2020
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12010/19553
dc.description.abstractLa proliferación de teorías económicas entorno al comercio internacional han permitido identificar que el comercio constantemente ha ido cambiado y la innovación está tomando su lugar en este entorno; esto lleva a enfocar una investigación en determinar los factores que permiten conocer qué efectos genera la interacción comercial entre países con similares factores productivos, la firma de acuerdos comerciales y las ganancias derivadas de estos últimos en los flujos de comercio bilateral, pues son aspectos importantes para comprender las nuevas teorías del comercio, analizando el periodo comprendido entre el año 1995 a 2015. Esta Investigación se enfoca en la utilización de datos de comercio internacional desagregados a 4 dígitos de la partida arancelaria del código harmonizado con el objetivo de calcular la medida de similitud en términos de ventaja comparativa revelada, calculando jaccard y la aplicación de un modelo gravitacional bajo efectos fijos (mejora los términos de resistencia multilateral) y pseudo máximo de poisson (útil para analizar flujos de comercio iguales a 0), por medio del cual se estima el impacto de las medidas de similitud y los acuerdos comerciales, de la misma manera, cómo la similitud se relaciona con las ganancias derivadas de los acuerdos comerciales; es importante resaltar, que el marco teórico se enfoca en aspectos relacionados con la caracterización de los países de acuerdo con sus capacidades productivas y acuerdos comerciales, finalmente el documento muestra las tendencias del comercio internacional.spa
dc.format.extent55 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozanospa
dc.sourcereponame:Expeditio Repositorio Institucional UJTLspa
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozanospa
dc.subjectAcuerdos comerciales.spa
dc.subjectDesarrollo económicospa
dc.titleComercio bilateral y acuerdos comerciales entre países con capacidades heterogéneasspa
dc.type.localTrabajo de grado de maestríaspa
dc.subject.lembComercio bilateralspa
dc.subject.lembComercio internacional.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.subject.keywordEconomic theoriesspa
dc.creator.degreeMagíster en Comercio Internacionalspa
dc.publisher.programMaestría en Comercio Internacionalspa
dc.relation.referencesAnderson, J. E. (2011). The gravity model. Annu. Rev. Econ., 3(1), 133-160.spa
dc.relation.referencesAndreas Du¨r, Leonardo Baccini and Manfred Elsig (2014). ‘The Design of International Trade Agreements: Introducing a New Database’, Review of International Organizations, 9(3): 353-375spa
dc.relation.referencesBaena Rojas, J. J. (06 de junio de 2019). La política de comercio exterior y las exportaciones colombianas. The Foreign Trade Policy and Colombian Exports. Revista de Economía Institucional, Vol. 21, N.° 41, 2019. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3400292spa
dc.relation.referencesBaier, S. L., & Bergstrand, J. H. (2007). Do free trade agreements actually increase members' international trade?. Journal of international Economics, 71(1), 72-95spa
dc.relation.referencesBalassa, B. (1965). Trade liberalisation and “revealed” comparative advantage 1. The manchester school, 33(2), 99-123.spa
dc.relation.referencesBartholomew, D. J., Knott, M., & Moustaki, I. (2011). Latent variable models and factor analysis: A unified approach (Vol. 904). John Wiley & Sons.spa
dc.relation.referencesBello, J., Reade, C., Nuzum, J., Loeb, G., Holmer, A., & Sandstrom, M. (1996). International Trade Highlights in 1995. The International Lawyer, 30(2), 391-423. Retrieved May 3, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/40707272spa
dc.relation.referencesBiadgleng, E. T., & Maur, J. C. (2011). The Influence of Preferential Trade Agreements on the Implementation of Intellectual Property Rights in Developing Countries: A First Look. UNCTAD-ICTSD Project on IPRs and Sustainable Development Paper, (33).spa
dc.relation.referencesBruno, M., Saracco, F., Squartini, T., & Dueñas, M. (2018). Colombian export capabilities: building the firms-products network. Entropy, 20(10), 785.spa
dc.relation.referencesDür, Andreas & Baccini, Leonardo & Elsig, Manfred & Milewicz, Karolina. (2013). The Design of International Trade Agreements: Introducing a New Dataset. Review of International Organizations. 10.1007/s11558-013-9179-8spa
dc.relation.referencesDür, A., Baccini, L., & Elsig, M. (2014). The design of international trade agreements: Introducing a new dataset. The Review of International Organizations, 9(3), 353-375.spa
dc.relation.referencesCampi, M., & Dueñas, M. (2016). Intellectual property rights and international trade of agricultural products. World Development, 80, 1-18.spa
dc.relation.referencesCampi, M., Dueñas, M., Barigozzi, M., & Fagiolo, G. (2018). Intellectual property rights, imitation, and development. The effect on cross-border mergers and acquisitions. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 28(2), 230–256. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2018.1518477spa
dc.relation.referencesCampi, M., M. Dueñas and G. Fagiolo (2020). “How do countries specialize in agricultural production? A complex network analysis of the global agricultural product space”, Environmental Research Letters, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc2f6spa
dc.relation.referencesCampi, M., & Dueñas, M. (2019). Intellectual property rights, trade agreements, and international trade. Research Policy, 48(3), 531–545. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.09.011spa
dc.relation.referencesCaldarelli, G., Cristelli, M., Gabrielli, A., Pietronero, L., Scala, A., & Tacchella, A. (2012). A Network Analysis of Countries’ Export Flows: Firm Grounds for the Building Blocks of the Economy. PLoS ONE, 7(10), 1–11. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047278spa
dc.relation.referencesCheong, J., & Tang, K. K. (2015). Heterogeneous effects of preferential trade agreements: How does partner similarity matter?. World Development, 66, 222-236.spa
dc.relation.referencesCristelli M, Gabrielli A, Tacchella A, Caldarelli G, Pietronero L. Measuring the intangibles:A metrics for the economic complexity of countries and products. PloS one. 2013;8(8):e70726.spa
dc.relation.referencesCristelli M, Tacchella A, Pietronero L. The heterogeneous dynamics of economic complexity.PloS one. 2015;10(2):e0117174spa
dc.relation.referencesFeenstra, R. C., Inklaar, R., & Timmer, M. (2013). PWT 8.0–a user guide. URL http://www. ggdc. net/pwt.spa
dc.relation.referencesFeenstra, R. C., Inklaar, R., & Timmer, M. P. (2015). The Next Generation of the Penn World: Version 8.0. American Economic Review, 105(10), 3150–3182. Available at: www.ggdc.net/pwtspa
dc.relation.referencesGaulier, G., & Zignago, S. (2010). Baci: international trade database at the product-level (the 1994-2007 version).spa
dc.relation.referencesHausmann, R. and D. Rodrik, "Economic Development as Self Discovery," Journal of Development Economics, December 2003spa
dc.relation.referencesHausmann, R., Hwang, J., & Rodrik, D. (2007). What you export matters. Journal of Economic Growth, 12(1), 1-25.spa
dc.relation.referencesHausmann, R., Hidalgo, C. A., Bustos, S., Coscia, M., & Simoes, A. (2014). The atlas of economic complexity: Mapping paths to prosperity. Mit Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesHeckscher, E.F. y Ohlin, B.G. (1991). Heckscher-Ohlin trade theory. The MIT Pressspa
dc.relation.referencesHelpman, E., & Krugman, P. R. (1985). Market structure and foreign trade: Increasing returns, imperfect competition, and the international economy. MIT press.spa
dc.relation.referencesHidalgo, C. A., & Hausmann, R. (2009). The building blocks of economic complexity. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 106(26), 10570-10575.spa
dc.relation.referencesHidalgo, C. A., Klinger B, Barab ́asi AL, Hausmann R. The product space conditions thedevelopment of nations. Science. 2007;317(5837):482–487.spa
dc.relation.referencesHofmann, C., Osnago, A., Ruta, M. (2018). The Content of Preferential Trade Agreements. World Trade Review. 18. 1-34. 10.1017/S1474745618000071.spa
dc.relation.referencesHummels, D., & Klenow, P. J. (2005). The variety and quality of a nation's exports. American Economic Review, 95(3), 704-723.spa
dc.relation.referencesKohl, T., & Trojanowska, S. (2015). Heterogeneous trade agreements, WTO membership and international trade: an analysis using matching econometrics. Applied Economics, 47(33), 3499-3509.spa
dc.relation.referencesKohl, T., Brakman. S., Garretsen, H. (2016). Do trade agreements stimulate interniational trade differently? Evidence from 296 trade agreements. World Econ. 39 (1), 97-131spa
dc.relation.referencesKozu, T., Nakayama, K., Mineshima, A., & Saita, Y. (2002). Changes in Japan’s Export and Import Structures. Bank of Japan Monthly Bulletin. Available at: https://www.boj.or.jp/en/research/brp/ron_2002/data/ron0205a.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesKrugman, P., Obstfeld, M., Garuz, J.T., Diaz, E.S., & Taña, J.O. (2001). Economía internacional. Pearson Educationspa
dc.relation.referencesLall S. (2000). The technological structure and performance of developing country manufactured exports, 1985-98. Oxford Development Studies, 28(3):337–369.spa
dc.relation.referencesLaos-Euscategui, I. (2018). Aplicación del modelo de gravedad para el análisis de los determinantes de las exportaciones peruanas hacia la unión europea 2000-2017.spa
dc.relation.referencesMagee, C.S. (2003). Endogenous preferential trade agreements: An empirical analysis. Contributions in Economic Analysis & Policy, 2(1).spa
dc.relation.referencesMagee, C.S.P. (2008). New measures of trade creation and trade diversion. Journal of International Economics, 75, 349–362spa
dc.relation.referencesMaskus, K. E., & Ridley, W. (2016). Intellectual property-related preferential trade agreements and the composition of trade. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper, (2016/35).spa
dc.relation.referencesMattoo, A., Mulabdic, A., & Ruta, M. (2017). Trade Creation and Trade Diversion in Deep Agreements. Policy Research Working Paper, 8206(September), 1–44.spa
dc.relation.referencesOqubay, A. (2018). The structure and performance of the Ethiopian manufacturing sector. In The Oxford Handbook of the Ethiopian Economy.spa
dc.relation.referencesOrganización Mundial Del Comercio (1998). Examen de las Políticas Comerciales Burkina Faso. Informe de Gobierno. WT/TPR/G/46, G46, Recuperado de: https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=S:/WT/TPR/G46.pdf&O pen=Truespa
dc.relation.referencesRicardo, D. (1817). Principios de economía política y tributación/por David Ricardo (No. 330 R5y.).spa
dc.relation.referencesRose, A. K. (2004). Do we really know that the WTO increases trade?. American economic review, 94(1), 98-114.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchott, P. K. (2004). Across-product versus within-product specialization in international trade. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(2), 647-678.spa
dc.relation.referencesSubramanian, A., & Wei, S. J. (2007). The WTO promotes trade, strongly but unevenly. Journal of international Economics, 72(1), 151-175.spa
dc.relation.referencesTeece, D. J., Rumelt, R., Dosi, G., & Winter, S. (1994). Understanding corporate coherence: Theory and evidence. Journal of economic behavior & organization, 23(1), 1-30.spa
dc.relation.referencesTinbergen, J., & Bos, H. (1962). Mathematical models of economic growth.spa
dc.relation.referencesWesterlund, J., & Wilhelmsson, F. (2011). Estimating the gravity model without gravity using panel data. Applied Economics, 43(6), 641-649.spa
dc.relation.referencesZaccaria, A., Cristelli, M., Tacchella, A., & Pietronero, L. (2014). How the taxonomy of products drives the economic development of countries. PLoS ONE, 9(12), 1–17. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.011377spa
dc.description.hashtag#ComercioInternacionalspa
dc.description.hashtag#Innovaciónspa
dc.description.hashtag# AcuerdosComercialesspa
dc.description.abstractenglishThe proliferation of economic theories around international trade have allowed to identify the trade has been changing and the innovation has been taking its place in this field; this leads on focus an investigation to determine the factors that allow us to know what effects generate the commercial interaction between countries with similar productive factors, signing of trade agreements and gains derived of the bilateral trade’s flows, well they are key aspects to comprehend the new trade theories, analyzing the period comprehended between the year 1995 to 2015. This research focuses on the use of interational trade data disaggregated to 4 digits of the tariff heading of the harmonized code in order to calculate the measure of similarity in terms of revealed comparative advantage, calculating Jaccard and the aplication of a gravity model under fixed effects (Multilateral resistence terms) and Poisson (useful to analysis of trade flows equal to zero), through which the impact of similarity measures and trade agreements is estimated, in the same way, how the similarity is related to the gains derived from the trade agreements; it’s important to stand out that the theorical framework focuses on aspects related with the countries’ characterization in accordance with its productive capabilities and trade agreements, finally the document shows the international trade tendency.spa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias Socialesspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccspa


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record