Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento

dc.contributor.advisorMihalopoulos, Bill
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-25T15:01:02Z
dc.date.available2021-03-25T15:01:02Z
dc.date.created2020
dc.identifier.isbn9780367406806
dc.identifier.otherhttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/33625
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12010/18300
dc.description.abstractThis chapter adopts methodological cosmopolitanism to revisit the Maria Luz Incident (1872), a colourful diplomatic episode that involved two civil suits brought before a court created for the specific purpose of adjudicating whether the ship’s captain ill-treated and abused his Chinese ‘passengers’ while the ship was anchored for repairs in Yokohama Port. The chapter argues that the Maria Luz Incident was not a seminal moment when rights talk was introduced to Japan. Rather, the incident was due to a lack of consensus in international law regarding whether the ‘coolie trade’ was free labour or slavery. The research traces how international law and narrow ideas of freedom (the freedom to enter contracts) became aligned with the workings of Japanese licensed prostitution.spa
dc.format.extent13 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisspa
dc.subjectJapanese studiesspa
dc.subjectJapanese culture and societyspa
dc.titleRethinking the Maria Luz Incident: Methodological cosmopolitanism and Meiji Japanspa
dc.subject.lembDerecho civilspa
dc.subject.lembDelitos sexualesspa
dc.subject.lembDelitos contra la personaspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.identifier.doi10.4324/9780367821494
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248spa
dc.rights.creativecommonshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/


Archivos en el documento

Thumbnail

Este documento aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del documento