Show simple item record

dc.creatorWitwer, Elizabeth
dc.creatorJones, Rachel K.
dc.creatorFuentes, Liza
dc.creatorCastle, S. Kate
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-19T20:56:03Z
dc.date.available2020-10-19T20:56:03Z
dc.date.created2020
dc.identifier.issn2590-1516spa
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.conx.2020.100043spa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12010/14599
dc.description.abstractObjective To examine service delivery in clinics that provided abortions in 2017, including differences by abortion policy climate. Study Design Using data from the Guttmacher Institute’s 2017 Abortion Provider Census, we examine amount charged for abortion care, pregnancy gestation at which abortions were offered, number of days per week that clinics provided abortions, and types of non-abortion services offered. Our analysis focuses on the 808 clinic facilities that provided 95% of abortions that year. Measures were calculated nationally and according to whether the clinic was in a state we categorized as hostile, middle-ground or supportive of abortion rights. Results In 2017, 64% of clinics offered abortion at 11 weeks pregnancy gestation, and 22% did so at 20 weeks gestation. Supportive states had a higher density of clinics that provide abortion for every measured gestation than hostile states. Clinics charged an average of $549 for a surgical abortion at 10 weeks and $551 for medication abortion. Some 46% of clinics in supportive states offered abortion care five or more days per week, compared to 29% in hostile states. Most clinics offered stand-alone contraception and family planning (87%) and gynecological care (85%), but the proportion of clinics that provided these services was higher in supportive states (93% and 90%) than in hostile states (75% and 73%). Conclusions A substantial proportion of abortion facilities provide a range of other health care services. Aspects of service delivery, such as number of days abortions are provided, may vary according to abortion policy climate. Implications statement Onerous policies in states hostile to abortion rights may inhibit some facilities from providing abortion more days per week, and if so, could further burden patients obtaining abortion care in these states.spa
dc.format.extent55 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherContraception: Xspa
dc.sourcereponame:Expeditio Repositorio Institucional UJTLspa
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozanospa
dc.subjectAbortionspa
dc.subjectAbortion clinicsspa
dc.subjectAbortion costspa
dc.subjectPolicyspa
dc.subjectHealth care accessspa
dc.titleAbortion service delivery in clinics by state policy climate in 2017spa
dc.type.localArtículospa
dc.subject.lembSíndrome respiratorio agudo gravespa
dc.subject.lembCOVID-19spa
dc.subject.lembSARS-CoV-2spa
dc.subject.lembCoronavirusspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.conx.2020.100043spa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1spa


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record