Show simple item record

dc.creatorSchmiege, Dennis
dc.creatorPerez Arredondo, Ana Maria
dc.creatorNtajal, Joshua
dc.creatorGellert Paris, Juliana Minetto
dc.creatorKoissi Savi, Merveille
dc.creatorPatel, Krupali
dc.creatorYasobant, Sandul
dc.creatorFalkenberg, Timo
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-06T16:55:51Z
dc.date.available2020-10-06T16:55:51Z
dc.date.created2020
dc.identifier.issn2352-7714spa
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2020.100170spa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12010/14254
dc.description.abstractThe ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic threatens global health thereby causing unprecedented social, economic, and political disruptions. One way to prevent such a pandemic is through interventions at the human-animal-environment interface by using an integrated One Health (OH) approach. This systematic literature review documented the three coronavirus outbreaks, i.e. SARS, MERS, COVID-19, to evaluate the evolution of the OH approach, including the identification of key OH actions taken for prevention, response, and control. The OH understandings identified were categorized into three distinct patterns: institutional coordination and collaboration, OH in action/implementation, and extended OH (i.e. a clear involvement of the environmental domain). Across all studies, OH was most often framed as OH in action/implementation and least often in its extended meaning. Utilizing OH as institutional coordination and collaboration and the extended OH both increased over time. OH actions were classified into twelve sub-groups and further categorized as classical OH actions (i.e. at the human-animal interface), classical OH actions with outcomes to the environment, and extended OH actions. The majority of studies focused on human-animal interaction, giving less attention to the natural and built environment. Different understandings of the OH approach in practice and several practical limitations might hinder current efforts to achieve the operationalization of OH by combining institutional coordination and collaboration with specific OH actions. The actions identified here are a valuable starting point for evaluating the stage of OH development in different settings. This study showed that by moving beyond the classical OH approach and its actions towards a more extended understanding, OH can unfold its entire capacity thereby improving preparedness and mitigating the impacts of the next outbreak.spa
dc.format.extent9 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherOne Healthspa
dc.sourcereponame:Expeditio Repositorio Institucional UJTLspa
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozanospa
dc.subjectOne Healthspa
dc.subjectSARSspa
dc.subjectMERSspa
dc.subjectCOVID-19spa
dc.subjectCollaborationspa
dc.subjectDisease ecologyspa
dc.titleOne Health in the context of coronavirus outbreaks: A systematic literature reviewspa
dc.type.localArtículospa
dc.subject.lembSíndrome respiratorio agudo gravespa
dc.subject.lembCOVID-19spa
dc.subject.lembSARS-CoV-2spa
dc.subject.lembCoronavirusspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2020.100170spa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1spa


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record