Immunogenicity and safety of a recombinant adenovirus type-5-vectored COVID-19 vaccine in healthy adults aged 18 years or older: a randomised, double-blind, placebocontrolled, phase 2 trial
Date
2020Author
Zhu, Feng-Cai
Guan, Xu-Hua
Li, Yu-Hua
Huang, Jian-Ying
Jiang, Tao
Hou, Li-Hua
Li, Jing-Xin
Yang, Bei-Fang
Wang, Ling
Wang, Wen-Juan
Wu, Shi-Po
Wang, Zhao
Wu, Xiao-Hong
Xu, Jun-Jie
Zhang, Zhe
Jia, Si-Yue
Wang, Bu-Sen
Hu, Yi
Liu, Jing-Jing
Zhang, Jun
Qian, Xiao-Ai
Li, Qiong
Pan, Hong-Xing
Jiang, Hu-Dachuan
Deng, Peng
Gou, Jin-Bo
Wang, Xue-Wen
Wang, Xing-Huan
Chen, Wei
Metadata
Show full item record
Documentos PDF
Imagenes y Videos
Abstract
Background This is the first randomised controlled trial for assessment of the immunogenicity and safety of a
candidate non-replicating adenovirus type-5 (Ad5)-vectored COVID-19 vaccine, aiming to determine an appropriate
dose of the candidate vaccine for an efficacy study.
Methods This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial of the Ad5-vectored COVID-19 vaccine was
done in a single centre in Wuhan, China. Healthy adults aged 18 years or older, who were HIV-negative and previous
severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection-free, were eligible to participate and were
randomly assigned to receive the vaccine at a dose of 1×10¹¹ viral particles per mL or 5×10¹⁰ viral particles per mL, or
placebo. Investigators allocated participants at a ratio of 2:1:1 to receive a single injection intramuscularly in the arm.
The randomisation list (block size 4) was generated by an independent statistician. Participants, investigators, and
staff undertaking laboratory analyses were masked to group allocation. The primary endpoints for immunogenicity
were the geometric mean titres (GMTs) of specific ELISA antibody responses to the receptor binding domain (RBD)
and neutralising antibody responses at day 28. The primary endpoint for safety evaluation was the incidence of
adverse reactions within 14 days. All recruited participants who received at least one dose were included in the
primary and safety analyses. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04341389.
Findings 603 volunteers were recruited and screened for eligibility between April 11 and 16, 2020. 508 eligible
participants (50% male; mean age 39·7 years, SD 12·5) consented to participate in the trial and were randomly
assigned to receive the vaccine (1×10¹¹ viral particles n=253; 5×10¹⁰ viral particles n=129) or placebo (n=126). In the
1×10¹¹ and 5×10¹⁰ viral particles dose groups, the RBD-specific ELISA antibodies peaked at 656·5 (95% CI
575·2–749·2) and 571·0 (467·6–697·3), with seroconversion rates at 96% (95% CI 93–98) and 97% (92–99),
respectively, at day 28. Both doses of the vaccine induced significant neutralising antibody responses to live
SARS-CoV-2, with GMTs of 19·5 (95% CI 16·8–22·7) and 18·3 (14·4–23·3) in participants receiving 1×10¹¹ and
5×10¹⁰ viral particles, respectively. Specific interferon γ enzyme-linked immunospot assay responses post vaccination
were observed in 227 (90%, 95% CI 85–93) of 253 and 113 (88%, 81–92) of 129 participants in the 1×10¹¹ and 5×10¹⁰
viral particles dose groups, respectively. Solicited adverse reactions were reported by 183 (72%) of 253 and 96 (74%) of
129 participants in the 1×10¹¹ and 5×10¹⁰ viral particles dose groups, respectively. Severe adverse reactions were
reported by 24 (9%) participants in the 1×10¹¹ viral particles dose group and one (1%) participant in the 5×10¹⁰ viral
particles dose group. No serious adverse reactions were documented.
Palabras clave
Immunogenicity; COVID-19; VaccineLink to resource
https://doi.org/10.1016/Collections
Estadísticas Google Analytics
Comments
Respuesta Comentario Repositorio Expeditio
Gracias por tomarse el tiempo para darnos su opinión.